Sproj
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Sep 6, 2013
- 55,062
- 67,332
Probably should sue the club who doesn't want him too. Very poorly done by the Roosters but doesn't seem to be any blowback for them.
Probably should sue the club who doesn't want him too. Very poorly done by the Roosters but doesn't seem to be any blowback for them.
Probably should sue the club who doesn't want him too. Very poorly done by the Roosters but doesn't seem to be any blowback for them.
Id said Walker considering he is vice captain. Bennett will want to keep things as simple as for Latrell next year I reckon so he doesnt have any outside distractions.@Redfern_1980 who is your pick for Souths captain next year given Cam Murray is out to start the year with a long term injury.
I read a report saying Latrell Mitchell could be considered
Good question mate. It better not be Fatrell Mitchell, I will literally consider joining your forum fulltime if that is the case lol.@Redfern_1980 who is your pick for Souths captain next year given Cam Murray is out to start the year with a long term injury.
I read a report saying Latrell Mitchell could be considered
How has the ATO signed off on this?The Courier mail is reporting that Vlandys has worked out a deal with the PNG Government where Australian players / staff going to the club won't pay any tax. the CM referred to it as the 'Danger Money' deal.
that effectively means the PNG club effectively have a 45% higher salary cap than the rest of the comp
Aren't they basing mostly out of Cairns or are they now sending them to Port Moresby??The Courier mail is reporting that Vlandys has worked out a deal with the PNG Government where Australian players / staff going to the club won't pay any tax. the CM referred to it as the 'Danger Money' deal.
that effectively means the PNG club effectively have a 45% higher salary cap than the rest of the comp
How has the ATO signed off on this?
Aren't they basing mostly out of Cairns or are they now sending them to Port Moresby??
Man, what would it take to remove this idiot running the game?
Wide World of Sports' The Mole is reporting that the rule change will see any team who has a kick-off that goes beyond the opposition's 20-metre line on the full concede a seven-tackle set.
Currently, any kick-off that goes over the dead ball line on the full concedes a penalty in the middle of halfway, but that requires a 60-metre kick.
A 30-metre kick is a far shorter proposition, and the NRL is understood to be hopeful that it will reduce the speed of collision in the first tackle after a kick-off.
The NRL had already made changes to rules policing short kick-offs and dropouts last year in an attempt to encourage teams to use the tactic more often, removing penalties for failed attempts and instead only allowing the non-offending team to receive a standard restart.
Jesus...if every kick off now becomes a contest for the ball like drop outs we will struggle for possession.unless Madge works overtime in this area.Wide World of Sports' The Mole is reporting that the rule change will see any team who has a kick-off that goes beyond the opposition's 20-metre line on the full concede a seven-tackle set.
Currently, any kick-off that goes over the dead ball line on the full concedes a penalty in the middle of halfway, but that requires a 60-metre kick.
A 30-metre kick is a far shorter proposition, and the NRL is understood to be hopeful that it will reduce the speed of collision in the first tackle after a kick-off.
The NRL had already made changes to rules policing short kick-offs and dropouts last year in an attempt to encourage teams to use the tactic more often, removing penalties for failed attempts and instead only allowing the non-offending team to receive a standard restart.