![Sproj](/data/avatars/m/8/8423.jpg?1488263273)
Sproj
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Sep 6, 2013
- 53,797
- 65,509
I would if they got there and Lockyer didn't
Well yeah.
I would if they got there and Lockyer didn't
I would if they got there and Lockyer didn't
Haven't watched 360 for a couple of months .. caught the second half of tonight's episode tho .. Locky's name was thrown in at the end of the convo, almost as an afterthought. I found it to be really insulting towards him tbh.Lockyer will be the next immortal IMO.
Just like we were bent over with the introduction of the 6 again.And we all know who that random team is going to be, don’t we?
Haven't watched 360 for a couple of months .. caught the second half of tonight's episode tho .. Locky's name was thrown in at the end of the convo, almost as an afterthought. I found it to be really insulting towards him tbh.
Media driven .. Locky doesn't stand a chance?![]()
Correct.Yeah this. Calls that Slater revolutionised the fullback role are bullshit. Slater was very good, but he just did what fullbacks had been doing for years, mastering it. But Lockyer is the one that changed fullback play forever. He was thrust in to the role as a matter of circumstance, with Langer and Walters owning the halves spots, but Locker utilising his ball-playing at the back is what changed how fullbacks have now played for the last 20 years.
The way the media bang on I think they’ll go for Cleary and Dylan brownEverything on 360 is insulting these days tbf. I just can't watch it anymore...which tells you how much weight I give to their opinions.
I guess it all depends on which way they go with it, do they pluck another name from the past like an Alf or do they go for a more recent name? If they go more recent, I think they go Lockyer. It wouldn't surprise me if they induct Lockyer and Smith at the same time though.
Close it was against Parra, but I'm pretty sure we were first game backJust like we were bent over with the introduction of the 6 again.
I may be wrong but I thought we were the Guinea pig against manly for the rule that’s killed the game
Yeah this. Calls that Slater revolutionised the fullback role are bullshit. Slater was very good, but he just did what fullbacks had been doing for years, mastering it. But Lockyer is the one that changed fullback play forever. He was thrust in to the role as a matter of circumstance, with Langer and Walters owning the halves spots, but Locker utilising his ball-playing at the back is what changed how fullbacks have now played for the last 20 years.
Sam burgess.Because the NRL is just such a well run organisation, the next immortals will be:
Paul Gallen
Jarryd Hayne