A genuine dilemma!

I never saw the old school guys play so here's a team from 98-2010

1) Billy the kid
2) Tuquiri
3) Hodges
4) GI
5) Sailor
6) Lockyer
7) Langer
8) Civo
9) Smith
10) Webcke
11) TALLIS!!!! (C)
12) Pricey
13) TC!

Hectic side.
 
Professor47 said:
I never saw the old school guys play so here's a team from 98-2010

1) Billy the kid
2) Tuquiri
3) Hodges
4) GI
5) Sailor
6) Lockyer
7) Langer
8) Civo
9) Smith
10) Webcke
11) TALLIS!!!! (C)
12) Pricey
13) TC!

Hectic side.

vs.

1) Minichello
2) Tahu
3) Coops
4) Gasnier
5) Mad dog
6) Daley
7) Joey
8) Shrek
9) Budurus
10) Mason
11) BK
12) Hindy
13) Fittler

All in their prime... man that would be one cracker of a series.
 
mrslong said:
our team craps all over their team.


agreed - but it's sort of harder to picture the NSW team, because all those players were at their peak at such diff times.
 
Who cares who's named? It doesn't matter what names show up on the night. It's all about what attitudes show up on the night.
 
Coxy said:
Who cares who's named? It doesn't matter what names show up on the night. It's all about what attitudes show up on the night.

Agreed.

But personally, I'd take Smith with a mediocre attitude over Macca with a good attitude [icon_wink
 

Active Now

  • GCBRONCO
  • Allo
  • johnny plath
  • matthewransom34@ic
  • Brotherdu
  • Sproj
  • Jazza
  • Bucking Beads
  • HarryAllan7
  • Brocko
  • FACTHUNT
  • winslow_wong
  • Manifesto
  • Harry Sack
  • Spoon
  • Battler
  • Footy Fanatic
  • RolledOates
  • marw
  • lynx000
... and 11 more.
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.