heartly87
NRL Player
- May 10, 2014
- 1,905
- 5,169
Um he is right we were 3 from our first 7 games. He was not talking about 10 games.I guess a lot of people aren't going to check (I didn't lol), easy to get away with it.
Um he is right we were 3 from our first 7 games. He was not talking about 10 games.I guess a lot of people aren't going to check (I didn't lol), easy to get away with it.
Nothing wrong with Tallis and Hodges having an opinion. We know they wanted their friend Walters appointed head coach. We also know it hasn't been a good start to the year. But I just think they are taking it a little too far at present. Tallis especially is coming across as bitter, not a constructive critic.
I think by the end of the interview they realised Tallis was given too much of a leash and were pretty quickly trying to shut it down.The major issue I have is the sycophantic fucknuckles in the media that let him run unchecked. He unloaded last night with half truths and bullshit and Kent just agreed with everything and Yvonne the spineless bitch just lapped it all up.
I think by the end of the interview they realised Tallis was given too much of a leash and were pretty quickly trying to shut it down.
Tallis got hugely defensive when Yvonne questioned whether any of his former teammates had been carried out (the idiot was too stupid to realise she was saying it tongue in cheek) and went on a massive rant, which somehow branched out to Lodge, despite the contradiction of WB being in charge when he was playing (ie the good culture days) and when Lodge was contracted.
I think when he finally shut up they ended the interview realizing he was going waaaay too far off topic.
I think by the end of the interview they realised Tallis was given too much of a leash and were pretty quickly trying to shut it down.
Tallis got hugely defensive when Yvonne questioned whether any of his former teammates had been carried out (the idiot was too stupid to realise she was saying it tongue in cheek) and went on a massive rant, which somehow branched out to Lodge, despite the contradiction of WB being in charge when he was playing (ie the good culture days) and when Lodge was contracted.
I think when he finally shut up they ended the interview realizing he was going waaaay too far off topic.
We can chat to him all we want, but if he has a contract there's nothing we can do to force him to retire. Assuming there is no option in our favour. If there is, it's a bit of a moot point because we wont have to have the chat.
I'll admit I was listening more as background noise, but I'm fairly sure when Tallis got defensive after Yvonne's question they basically didn't get a chance to say anything for a few minutes till he stopped.I might have to watch it again because I didn’t take that away but I was seething by halfway through so probably missed it.
Not necessarily, Tigers were just done for promising Farah an ambassador role after footy... although they were stupid enough to put it in the contractIf Darius decides to retire "voluntarily" after a heart to heart there is nothing stopping us rehiring him to come back onto the coaching staff or count the paperclips as far as I understand it. Of course he doesn't have to retire but if he has to choose between retirement and playing out his days in Qcup or being given a job after he retires on similar $$ I'm sure he could be persuaded.
If Darius decides to retire "voluntarily" after a heart to heart there is nothing stopping us rehiring him to come back onto the coaching staff or count the paperclips as far as I understand it. Of course he doesn't have to retire but if he has to choose between retirement and playing out his days in Qcup or being given a job after he retires on similar $$ I'm sure he could be persuaded.
Not necessarily, Tigers were just done for promising Farah an ambassador role after footy... although they were stupid enough to put it in the contract
I don’t think that’s so. We’d get smashed if we did that.
Isn't there a salary cap for coaches and support staff now? Seibold and the coaching staff might have to take the pay cut to allow that to happen even if the NRL signed off on it.It wouldn't be kosher that's for sure but I don't think it's something they can stop. Player retires, club wants to keep him in some capacity after retirement. The hard part is managing the $$s .
Yes, there is.Is there any doubt WB giving Boyd a contract of that length when he did, for as long as he did and for as much as he did was merely a golden parachute at the expense of the team and club for a favorite of WB?
I think by the end of the interview they realised Tallis was given too much of a leash and were pretty quickly trying to shut it down.
Tallis got hugely defensive when Yvonne questioned whether any of his former teammates had been carried out (the idiot was too stupid to realise she was saying it tongue in cheek) and went on a massive rant, which somehow branched out to Lodge, despite the contradiction of WB being in charge when he was playing (ie the good culture days) and when Lodge was contracted.
I think when he finally shut up they ended the interview realizing he was going waaaay too far off topic.
I will throw one name up as an example to confirm that a lot of this is utter BS - Julian O'Neill. He came into where I was working (at the time he was with the Broncos) for a professional appointment one day during the day and he was off his face drunk.