gUt
NRL Player
- Mar 4, 2008
- 2,460
- 328
If you don't like diveball and find the idea of it pushing your favourite sport into the background, if not cancelled altogether, you're an insular bogan.
Yes but the facilities for Sydney Olympics was built in one main area in Homebush and upgrades to facilities already in use. No-one really was disadvantaged compared to what Fifa are expecting from the AFL and NRL comps. It probably won't be a financial disaster. I am more interested in who is going to end up paying for it all. Even more so when it is a sporting event I don't want here.Jeba said:Well the Sydney Olympics cost us a reported $2.286billion, and there was certainly no financial disaster from that. I have no doubt that the World Cup in Australia would do a lot more good than harm.
Nashy said:Are any of them big enough?
Coxy said:The exceptions are the USA and now South Africa, and to a lesser extent, South Korea/Japan. They weren't really "soccer" nations. So they are trying to expand.
Coxy said:In fact, I'm quite anti government being heavily involved as funders of sporting facilities (as in for professional sports). They should be able to supply grants, but they shouldn't be the majority funder.
Flutterby said:Coxy said:The exceptions are the USA and now South Africa, and to a lesser extent, South Korea/Japan. They weren't really "soccer" nations. So they are trying to expand.
Ahh true - not really soccer nations, but do they have a strong domestic competing code that was going to be affected the way NRL and AFL potentially are? Obviously RU is big in RSA but not really domestically - they can be playing their Super 14/Tri-Nations matches away during Soccer WC period. And I'll bet there was no suggestion of the NFL being put on hold in the USA.
Flutterby said:Coxy said:The exceptions are the USA and now South Africa, and to a lesser extent, South Korea/Japan. They weren't really "soccer" nations. So they are trying to expand.
Ahh true - not really soccer nations, but do they have a strong domestic competing code that was going to be affected the way NRL and AFL potentially are? Obviously RU is big in RSA but not really domestically - they can be playing their Super 14/Tri-Nations matches away during Soccer WC period. And I'll bet there was no suggestion of the NFL being put on hold in the USA.
Flutterby said:Coxy said:In fact, I'm quite anti government being heavily involved as funders of sporting facilities (as in for professional sports). They should be able to supply grants, but they shouldn't be the majority funder.
I agree with you here. A major sports event needs to see itself as a business and needs to stand on it's own 2 feet and pay for itself. I strong believe that government funding on sport should be directed to the grassroots level and to other more minor sports/national teams that aren't able to attract large corporate sponsorship/support due to their lesser profile (though they should be certainly still trying to get more corporate and less government money).