M
mick
NRL Captain
- Mar 4, 2008
- 3,254
- 0
- Thread starter
- #55
hence why i said at LEAST the mid nineties. at least means generally that long or longer.Anonymous person said:mick said:[quote="Anonymous person":3rn9wc0x]
and IMO, people that havent been supporting the broncos since at least mid-90s shouldnt even be voting in a 'Best Ever Broncos Team' poll.
And that's an opinion even less valid than those you are criticising, particularly because many claim the Broncos teams of the EARLY 90s were among the best in history.
if you saw the mid nineties you saw the 98 team, which is widely regarded as one of the best of the modern era.[/quote:3rn9wc0x]
Yes, but it also means you couldn't compare between the 98 and the 92 teams, right?
I think any and every person has a right to partake in this thread. Hell, those who hate the Broncos but have been watching footy since before 1988 have technically more of a right than you to vote here. Look, you can watch classic matches on many different formats and the results here have IMO been spot on the money. For every one person who might think Shane Perry was the longest serving broncos halfback of all time, there's 500,000 who say Langer is the best we've seen in the #7 at the club.