I know the talk about who we haven't signed is mostly about backs but what about Matt Scott? He possibly would've made even prince look good with his relentless go forward.
I think there is a massive difference between players that could "improve our club" vs players that could "win us a premiership". I'd rather pass on a few of the former for a few years to gain a few of the latter in future years.
I agree with this, we have a history of buying quality which has added the x factor to lead us to winning premierships.I think there is a massive difference between players that could "improve our club" vs players that could "win us a premiership". I'd rather pass on a few of the former for a few years to gain a few of the latter in future years.
I think there is a massive difference between players that could "improve our club" vs players that could "win us a premiership". I'd rather pass on a few of the former for a few years to gain a few of the latter in future years.
We did that when we decided to back Norman and Hunt when Lockyer retired. That ended well.
Did we really back Hunt though....
We did that when we decided to back Norman and Hunt when Lockyer retired. That ended well.