C
Coxy
International Captain
- Mar 4, 2008
- 31,212
- 1,886
Probably because we don't have a better option at fullback.
Just because I love firing up the rumour brigade...
So there's a few people here that consider the Wallace move to hooker as more than meets the eye. That it's being done because Wallace is leaving, and it's giving Hunt & Prince an opportunity to gel as they're our likely 2014 halves. My question then is this - why is Norman being kept at fullback? If Hook is looking towards 2014, why is this heartless, lazy bum still our #1? Playing Devil's advocate, consider this. He's being kept there because... dun dunnnn... our #1 for 2014 isn't part of our squad yet. Yeah, get them fires burning!
Everyone views Kahu as a fullback so unless a fullback falls into our laps why chase one and risk losing Kahu before he has had his chance?
That was a little bit different. For starters, Ben Hunt wasn't in the side that night. Hodges went to fullback & Norman to 5/8. Also, McCullough was off the field. The only constant is Wallace to hooker. Although in saying that, McCullough did get a go in 2nd row against Titans.
completely agree, especially on these 2.I might be alone in this one but Alex Glenn has gone backwards at a rate of knots this year. The lines he ran in previous years, nowhere to be seen, doesn't seem to be making a dent in the line, just basic hitups and tackling. He's turned into a robot instead of a player we can rely on in the opp 20.
....
I don't buy into the theory at all that we have the talent. I think we're closing our eyes and hoping that when we open them, the situation will have changed. We've recruited badly and now the realization has set in.
That was a little bit different. For starters, Ben Hunt wasn't in the side that night. Hodges went to fullback & Norman to 5/8. Also, McCullough was off the field. The only constant is Wallace to hooker. Although in saying that, McCullough did get a go in 2nd row against Titans.
completely agree, especially on these 2.
glenn was our leading try scorer the last 2 years. halfway through this year hes on what, 1 try? hes gone missing in attack. i blame a lot of that on how hes been used though. the last 2 years he was an 80 minute player, this year hes not just so we can give gillett 80 minutes.
and yeh, we've recruited dreadfully. i wouldnt even call what we've done recruiting lol. i cant see us becoming a force unless we shed at least half of our current roster. thaiday/hannant/hodges are our 3 big players and they all underperform regularly for their standing and pay cheques. none of them are gamebreakers either, with hodges being the closest but unable to stay on the field for successive weeks.
tkday said:I agree with everything Big Pete except Hunt, still too early to start comparing him to anyone.
Out of our highest paid players, 1 is injured (Yow Yeh), 2 are injured every second week (Hodges, McGuire), 1 is inconsistent (Wallace) and 1 is injured at the moment but usually pretty safe (Hannant)
Oh and also our best and most consistent player for the past few years (In my opinion) Corey Parker probably only has a couple of years left.
I dare say we're in a bit of trouble unless we make some moves.
Yep, although I think Wallace is pretty consistent if you ask me. He's giving us about all he will ever give us. Sure he has some ups and down like most, but for the most part he's consistently mediocre.