I'm thinking much the same as you here. I think @upthebroncs is maybe meshing his memories of them both together a little bit. Paasi was certainly pretty handy in patches, but Pulu wasn't anything to write home about. Not terrible either, just a bit meh.
No no, I know exactly who they are and how they play. I liked both of them at the time. Of course Agnatius offered more in attack but I believe Pulu is as solid as a rock and that's what I like about him.
Pretty cynical Morepudding, but probably correct
You may be right, my memory is mostly highlights of back then now. Don't remember massive amounts about individual players. I won't argue that on a base contract he may have something to offer. Didn't watch many warriors games with him though.
fb.watch
Mate that's not a serious question. I am very vocal about the things I disagree with.
I reckon player managers should be put in a 20 foot shipping container, towed out to the edge of the continental shelf, drill a dozen 50mm holes in the bottom (so it doesn't sink to fast), once settled on the bottom we get the GPS mark to fish on it
He's definitely said Lodge a few times.
I don't think you should hold back anymore, just say what you mean!!
Problem with that approach is once again you get little to no experience along with being a hail mary on some Fijian winger who may be great or end up not even being good enough as depth. Not saying Mead or Copley are great or even ideal circumstantial signings but you know what you're getting plus the added experience and possible mentoring. Heck of a lot safer. I'll add the Mead one confuses me though.
My main problem is that signing Mead and Copley for this year will not help us win a competition anytime sooner.
