Am I the only person who sees nothing in Alex Glenn? Getting a start over Te'o, geez.
And Thaiday in the front row = Thaiday circa 2008, not the 2010 line break machine. Bit disappointed with team tbh but will leave judgements till after the game.
GCBRONCO said:You have to blood new centres eventually and you can't be afraid to do so just because your bigname centre is absent, besides good performances in the offseason's should be rewarded and in Reed's case he deserves it.
Big_Dave said:GCBRONCO said:You have to blood new centres eventually and you can't be afraid to do so just because your bigname centre is absent, besides good performances in the offseason's should be rewarded and in Reed's case he deserves it.
Not really.
You can start their career on the wing and eventually ease them into the centres which is one of the hardest position to defend in.
Much like Hodges but he started playing dummy half in the top grade.
GCBRONCO said:Big_Dave said:GCBRONCO said:You have to blood new centres eventually and you can't be afraid to do so just because your bigname centre is absent, besides good performances in the offseason's should be rewarded and in Reed's case he deserves it.
Not really.
You can start their career on the wing and eventually ease them into the centres which is one of the hardest position to defend in.
Much like Hodges but he started playing dummy half in the top grade.
Sorry but it doesn't change the fact they are capable of playing in the centres, nor does it mean there aren't defensive concerns for that player out on the wing or in other positions that can arise should you start them elsewhere, I could easily target a centre playing out on the wing or at fullback for instance who isn't so great under the high ball or use players with speed and agility against a player who isn't so effective out wide defensively. I'd much prefer to put them in a position they feel much more confident and suited for their debut.
Big_Dave said:GCBRONCO said:[quote="Big_Dave":2arexta4]GCBRONCO said:You have to blood new centres eventually and you can't be afraid to do so just because your bigname centre is absent, besides good performances in the offseason's should be rewarded and in Reed's case he deserves it.
Not really.
You can start their career on the wing and eventually ease them into the centres which is one of the hardest position to defend in.
Much like Hodges but he started playing dummy half in the top grade.
Sorry but it doesn't change the fact they are capable of playing in the centres, nor does it mean there aren't defensive concerns for that player out on the wing or in other positions that can arise should you start them elsewhere, I could easily target a centre playing out on the wing or at fullback for instance who isn't so great under the high ball or use players with speed and agility against a player who isn't so effective out wide defensively. I'd much prefer to put them in a position they feel much more confident and suited for their debut.
draggx said:Big_Dave said:GCBRONCO said:[quote="Big_Dave":lwp5oxi2]GCBRONCO said:You have to blood new centres eventually and you can't be afraid to do so just because your bigname centre is absent, besides good performances in the offseason's should be rewarded and in Reed's case he deserves it.
Not really.
You can start their career on the wing and eventually ease them into the centres which is one of the hardest position to defend in.
Much like Hodges but he started playing dummy half in the top grade.
Sorry but it doesn't change the fact they are capable of playing in the centres, nor does it mean there aren't defensive concerns for that player out on the wing or in other positions that can arise should you start them elsewhere, I could easily target a centre playing out on the wing or at fullback for instance who isn't so great under the high ball or use players with speed and agility against a player who isn't so effective out wide defensively. I'd much prefer to put them in a position they feel much more confident and suited for their debut.
Yeah that's why they are playing Beale who is a bench utility at best and Reed who is really a backrower in the centres.
If you're going to do that, may as well put Glenn and Te'o in the centres.
It is easier to defend on the wing than in the centres.
Yeah that's why they are playing Beale who is a bench utility at best and Reed who is really a backrower in the centres.
If you're going to do that, may as well put Glenn and Te'o in the centres.
It is easier to defend on the wing than in the centres.
GCBRONCO said:Yeah that's why they are playing Beale who is a bench utility at best and Reed who is really a backrower in the centres.
If you're going to do that, may as well put Glenn and Te'o in the centres.
It is easier to defend on the wing than in the centres.
You might have an arguement for Beale and in that case I would agree that Glenn or Te'o could have been a better selection but Reed has earnt his debut during the preseason and showed his worthy of a backing in the centres and I just don't see a problem with his selection there, I'd rather see at least one of Te'o or Glenn stay in the forwards then both in the centres if someone like Reed is available.
Te'o is wasted on the bench considering the Broncos starting centres for the game.
He is so dangerous on the fringes.
Big_Dave said:At full strength and fully fit the backline will be
1. Hoffman
2. Kemp
3. Yow Yeh
4. Hodges
5. Gagai
Big_Dave said:At full strength and fully fit the backline will be
1. Hoffman
2. Kemp
3. Yow Yeh
4. Hodges
5. Gagai