How does Blair compare with Kennedy? That's the real question, as this is basically a swap that we have to pay more money for (unless Blair signed for minimum).
I wasn't a fan of Kennedy, he was a flop, but so too was Blair. I have no real feelings on the players, but am disappointed in what appears to me to be WB's unwillingness to work with somebody who was already at the club that he may not have been the biggest fan of. It's one thing to sign a free agent Blair over a free agent Kennedy, but to actually shove off Kennedy (and for that matter, Hannant) at our expense and then pay even more money to sign a player like Blair (who is essentially just another disappointment) speaks to me as an unwillingness on WB's part to work with what he's got.
Fair enough if you **** off a poor performer and replace them with a young gun or marquee signing, but to replace one disappointment with another doesn't send any kind of message that poor performance will be punished. All it really says is that you better hope the coach likes you. And when you consider we're likely paying money to have Blair instead of Kennedy, it has the potential to hurt the club too. Particularly given we've signed him for 3 years.