rnabokov
State of Origin Captain
Contributor
- Mar 5, 2008
- 9,586
- 8,889
I’m curious, are people putting Gillo in the same basket as B+M because they
A) don’t feel he’s better than Pangai/Glenn
B) don’t want his contract
or
C) don’t think he’s worth his contract (this is different to B)
My bias acknowledged, he doesn’t deserve to be on the chopping block
Gillo and for mine, Milford are unfairly targeted on here. They are victims of the diabolical ineptitude of Dariu$$$ and Macca, and the selection of Turpin at 7 when SOS was available, as well as the senseless move of Milford to FB to paper over the crack that Dariu$$$ is.
The only "redemption" for Seibold is that he can argue he gave the inept time to change, they failed, and now they have to go.
At a minimum, Bird to FB, Milford to 6, Dearden at 7 and Turpin/Seggy at 9. Seibold can then devise a half decent game plan based on a passing/running/support ... or else, he goes as well.
Dariu$$$ and Macca can be seen as excuses for Seibold's failure as a coach. They need to go so he no longer has any excuse and his true colours as a coach are visible to all.