Sproj
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Sep 6, 2013
- 55,259
- 67,556
I'll be in Bangkok in transit to China, just not really interested at all this year.
The one that gets me is the Lockyer comparison.
After Lockyer's first fifteen games, he had only won five matches compared to Pearce's four or something like that.
First of all, I just love it how those draws have retroactively been treated as this black mark against Queensland. We were all alive around this point, was any Queenslander complaining about the draw? Pretending otherwise is stupid.
The other is that Lockyer was a part of four successful campaigns (98, 99, 01, 02). Pearce hasn't been involved with any and sure as anything wasn't the Player of the Series in any of those years.
I don't even disagree with Pearce's selection this time around. Of all the halves, I thought he was easily the right pick but that article just seems so skewed and false that it puts me off.
Unfortunately, this will be the year where NSW will win and it will be tonight.
I just cannot see a win for us.
Thought the exact same thing. SF's death riding is always good news.
.........I thought Pearce was solid in Game 1 and did his job. He has been very good this season and hopefully he gets what he deserves tomorrow night...............
QLD have named a better side for Game 2 but they still look a bit small up front which was the Blues advantage in game 1 and the fact they dropped Oates who added plenty of meters will hurt them. Been thinking the Blues strength up front, momentum behind them and home ground advantage will get them over the line.