Gillett to Titans? Please NO

B

bingale16

NYC Player
May 11, 2015
153
158
Please help this isnt going to happen. Should be a priority signing
-------------------------------------
FOX Sports’ rugby league guru Ben Ikin says the Gold Coast Titans could corrupt the NRL player market in their pursuit of Queensland representative Matt Gillett.


The Titans are said to be interested in the Origin forward, who is off contract this year and yet to extend his deal with the Broncos.


The Titans have plenty of space in their salary cap to sign a big name player.


In the past 12 months the club has had Daly Cherry-Evans backflip on a lucrative offer, lost Aidan Sezer to Canberra, lost big money forwards Nate Myles and Dave Taylor and let James Roberts slip with a forged signature bungle.


As a result they have cash to spend, and are on the hunt for a marquee signing for 2017 and beyond.


Ikin says the Titans are in a position to totally corrupt the transfer market by offering overs to Gillett or another star.


“This is what I love about Market Watch and roster management, is when you have a player in the market like the Titans who have spent nowhere near their full salary cap, what they can do is corrupt player values,” Ikin told the Market Watch podcast.


“They are desperate to attract talent so they go to the stronger clubs and could basically retire Matt Gillett a millionaire of they want to.


“If they say internally that he is the guy we’re going to build our forward pack around, or they go somewhere else like they did with Daly Cherry-Evans and say this is the guy we build our club or backline around, you’re talking $800,000 or a $1 million (contract).


“All of a sudden a club like the Broncos, who have a really strong list with a lot of depth, simply can’t match it.


“It puts the player in a position, thinking do I stay at a club I know with a coach I’m happy with and have consistent on-field success, or do I potentially set myself up for the rest of my life?


“As Kerry Packer famously said a long time ago, everybody has a price.”


Gold Coast tried to lure Cherry-Evans north with a big-money offer last year and he accepted, before reneging in June to sign an extension with Manly.


While the club is still reeling from that backflip, it means the Titans have money up their sleeve to chase another big name.


And while Ikin understands the cash on offer will be tempting, he believes Gillett will opt to stay with the Broncos where he will soon become one of their most important forwards.


“Think about (Brisbane’s) roster at the moment,” Ikin said.


“If they’re smart they are backending Matt Gillett, because who’s going to come off in the next two years? Corey Parker and Sam Thaiday,” Ikin said.


“A lot of that money that has been channelled to those two guys is going to Matt Gillett. Particularly off the back of what I’ve seen in these first two rounds.


“He’s hitting holes again, he’s rediscovered how to get himself into space, he’s playing well down that right edge off Ben Hunt.”
Gillett, 27, has played 12 Origin games for the Maroons and a total of 131 with the Broncos since 2010.
After a quiet first season under Wayne Bennett, the Queensland representative has rediscovered his best form in the opening two games of the 2016 season.
 
So this is just Ikin speaking shit, he has writing an article about some fanciful scenario he has dreamed up. How is this guy anything?
 
That'd be a great signing for the Titans
 
"Hey, it would be cool if the Titans signed Gillett, right?". That's the article summed up here. No real substance. I wouldn't worry yet.
 
Surely Gillett knows by now that all careers die at the Titans
 
Wayne Bennett probably helped write that article-telling him to stick around, a better payday is coming.
 
Last edited:
"Dude, wouldn't it be sweet if the Tigers signed James Graham."

Can I be a 'journalist' now too?
 
It would have to be a truck load of money to get me to go to the Titans.

I don't think Wayne would let him go particularly if he keeps playing like he has done in the two games this year.

Here is my theory, I reckon that Parkers new contract will be more TPA and less cash (Wayne plays hard ball as careers start coming to an end), hence Parker now hires a manager to help with the organising of those TPAs. Same situation for Sam, he wanted to stay, Wayne was offering less cash, manager takes time to rustle up some extra TPAs.

Those savings get passed on to younger players such as Gillett, he stays even for less money than he can get elsewhere knowing that he is already at the best club.
 
Last edited:
Gillett would be a HUGE loss BUT we do have a logjam of young forwards waiting for their chance so as much as it would completely suck to lose him, its not look we couldn't find a half decent replacement. That said, believe me I do not want to lose him, he is our best second rower comfortably.
 
Even if this article has any truth in it, Matty is becoming one of the more visible Broncos. I've seen a lot of footage of him running coaching clinics etc. Coupled with on field improvement, I reckon he'll be able to secure some TPA's and like the article say's if he's being backended on some of them CP13/Thaiday dollars I'm sure he'll be comfortable in the future without having to commit career suicide down at the Titans (or whatever they'll be called then).
 
I'd argue that Gillett has been our most consistent player week in week out for the last 18 months, despite not getting much good ball last year, he still made plenty of metres and was a massive asset in defence.

Our 4 notable off-contract players this year are Milford, Gillett, Parker, Wallace.. I'd happily sacrifice Wallace and give Parker a 1 year minimum contract to re-sign the other 2 long term for big money.
 
Didn't Milford re-sign?

Anyway, if we'd won the premiership last year, I could expect players accepting a big pay day. But after coming that close, I would expect players, who are naturally competitive, to chase that trophy. He'll stay.
 
So market forces of supply and demand are "corruption" now?
 
So market forces of supply and demand are "corruption" now?

He's not calling the titans corrupt. He is saying they will "corrupt player values", how much they are worth. Exactly like what ricky and the faders tried to do with milford, the first player to reach 1 million dollars in value after 12 games.
 
He's not calling the titans corrupt. He is saying they will "corrupt player values", how much they are worth. Exactly like what ricky and the faders tried to do with milford, the first player to reach 1 million dollars in value after 12 games.

Agree with you on the Titans - just reiterating the article was shit.

The salary cap is a farce because the auditor sets a price floor for each player.

e.g. Parramatta - you can't pay Israel Folau less than $800K, because that an equivalent, marquee player should be paid (e.g. Greg Inglis is paid at the Rabbitohs).

What's market value? Especially in a market for individual services its highly highly subjective market - how much per year is a real chance to play for a premiership? What about living in your birthplace? Continuing on at your club of 15 years? Being coached by a top tier coach? Living close to your wife and family? Are these values published or just auditor discretion?

So even if Israel accepts $400K per year because he loves Western Sydney, has 7 ARU funded houses and just wants to get back into the game, you can't pay him less than what the auditor says (though that story about Izzy now has a lot more context with the Parra board).

Invisible hand my arse.
 

Active Now

  • Fozz
  • Battler
  • Sproj
  • GCBRONCO
  • Mr Fourex
  • MrMoore
  • Fitzy
  • Bucking Beads
  • Harry Sack
  • Browny
  • Robboi_321
  • Gaz
  • broncsgoat
  • Lostboy
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.