NEWS Haas gets pay bump, long term deal in holding pattern

News LTD is reporting the Broncos board will formally approve a 3 year extension to Payne Haas' existing contract to tie him up for another 6 years. Money not mentioned, but there is talk of grooming him for future captaincy. The deal appears to be done, but won't be formally announced until after the season. It will be the longest contract in the Broncos' 33 year history.

Walters:


“Payne is a natural leader, not so much with his words but his actions. He is never far off the ball whether it’s attack or defence. When you are building a premiership team, you need middle forwards like Payne Haas. The Storm have Jesse Bromwich. The Roosters have Jared Waerea-Hargreaves. Every top team has a dominant prop."

“Payne is a remarkable forward, he has a great work ethic. He wants to win at all costs and that’s what we need throughout the whole club.”

Ikin:

“Payne is a special player. He is a powerhouse, he leads from the front on the field in one of the toughest positions you can play in a game. He brings his best to every training session and every match. He is world class. He is the guy others in the club look to. He does it with his leadership and it’s based on actions. He performs with great humility."

“Payne has this view on the world where he is committed to doing things for others, he is very cognisant of the fact he is part of a team. As single-minded as you need to be to succeed in the front row, Payne has this great affinity for his teammates and they really recognise that. It is innate in Payne. He is leading for others. It‘s not just all about him. He has some magnificent traits as a leader.”

Greg Alexander:

“Having seen him in the NSW set-up, I’ve seen Payne’s attitude. When you sign someone for a long time, you have to consider will they handle things emotionally and does it matter how much they are paid from year to year? The player’s performances would have to stay consistent and I see that in Payne. It wouldn’t matter how much he was paid or how long for, I know Payne would do the job week in, week out.”

McHunt
 
Interesting
Some figure is usually put out by someone .
I guess when the deal is done somebody will put out a figure (although I know it won’t necessarily be right)
Payne is contracted to us for 3 more seasons at $500k. Let's say he could get $1.2M on the market right now, which would break any club, but some club might be willing. In his head he's thinking he's a $1.2M player who's only on $500k. That has to niggle at him.

Now let's say his manager goes to the club and asks for 1M a year. Payne is still thinking he's a $1.2M player who's not getting enough. But his manager explains that he's getting $1.5M more for the next three years if he accepts it. But, Payne thinks, they're still underpaying him what another club could pay. The club are *****. His manager is a ****. And so it goes on.

Of course, it's doing his head in.
 
That smh article is absolute speculating BS rot from Weidler.
He is making assumptions here there and everywhere with not one quote (other then money bill.)
For SBW to come out and say Payne should be earning 1.2m right now because Fifita is, is laughable.
Milford has been on $1mill for how many years now, and probably been the highest paid 6 in the game. Whilst pretty much every other 6 in the NRL has been playing at a higher level then him week in, week out, I never read an article saying this 6 at this club should be earning a mill because look at Milford, he is. Same goes for Ash Taylor.
Why aren‘t these articles being written about other top teir players in the NRL?
Didn’t we read lately that Paps just signed for 650k to stay at the Storm? Lol.
Fact is Payne is here until at least the end of 2024.
Brisbane have quiet sometime to sort this out with Payne however, the longer Payne leaves it, means the longer Payne has to wait to get his pay raise - which I 100% believe he is entitled to.
 
Under this current regime, he’ll probably go to French rugby for a weekend and break his contract and then come back to a fresh contract with the Roosters for ‘less’ (wink, wink) a week later and not only approved but announced as a huge coup for the Roosters.
 
So how much per season are the broncos offering him?
This in under a Rothfield byline:

"The Broncos board has approved a staggering $6 million offer over six years but Haas has baulked at signing any agreement."

"the Orrs, who are on a seven per cent commission, would get an annual payment of $70,000 or $420,000 over the lifetime of the contract."

He also mentions that the Orrs lost Cherry-Evans this year.
 
This in under a Rothfield byline:

"The Broncos board has approved a staggering $6 million offer over six years but Haas has baulked at signing any agreement."

"the Orrs, who are on a seven per cent commission, would get an annual payment of $70,000 or $420,000 over the lifetime of the contract."

He also mentions that the Orrs lost Cherry-Evans this year.
Smart of Haas to let Orr get him a 6 year 6 mil deal then to sack him before signing it so he doesn’t need to pay commission.
 
Smart of Haas to let Orr get him a 6 year 6 mil deal then to sack him before signing it so he doesn’t need to pay commission.

unfortunately that means it could end up in a legal fight, that wouldn't be a good thing for Haas
 
I don’t know what you pay the kid but I think he’s already bordering on the best prop of all time at 21. His game continues to evolve - he’s now consistently breaking through the line, he’s starting to ball play somewhat, the offload is beginning to appear, and he is beginning to amass a list of huge defensive efforts (Tedesco try saver, batting the ball dead v Cronulla in the last game).

imo he does his job as good as Trbo or Cleary do, the difference being that a prop can only put the game on a platter for your backs to capitalise on, which ours rarely do, where as a fullback or halfback playing at that level will be a try producing machine. The question I guess though is how much is a prop worth even when they are in a league of their own.

We seem to have no issue producing great young forwards. So I think we can spend big on Haas, a few cheap professionals, and then fill the forward depth with young guys who move on when they are due a big upgrade.
 
I don’t know what you pay the kid but I think he’s already bordering on the best prop of all time at 21. His game continues to evolve - he’s now consistently breaking through the line, he’s starting to ball play somewhat, the offload is beginning to appear, and he is beginning to amass a list of huge defensive efforts (Tedesco try saver, batting the ball dead v Cronulla in the last game).

imo he does his job as good as Trbo or Cleary do, the difference being that a prop can only put the game on a platter for your backs to capitalise on, which ours rarely do, where as a fullback of halfback playing at that level will be a try producing machine. The question I guess though is how much is a prop worth even when they are in a league of their own.
JFH is widely regarded as the second best prop in the game, Penrith have reportedly signed him on a bit over 800k.

For me Haas is worth anything under a million, even a million is not a bad buy. He's obviously better than JFH IMO. He does more in a significantly worse roster.

Haas being in a team gives a good halfback far more oppurtunities a game to actually be in a position to capitalise. Personally I'd be very happy with 900-950k x 6 years. You only need to see how we play when he's on vs off the field, he's every bit a million dollar player and he's not a lazy **** like Fifita. His maturity and consistency for his age is something I've never seen from a forward.
 
JFH is widely regarded as the second best prop in the game, Penrith have reportedly signed him on a bit over 800k.

For me Haas is worth anything under a million, even a million is not a bad buy. He's obviously better than JFH IMO. He does more in a significantly worse roster.

Haas being in a team gives a good halfback far more oppurtunities a game to actually be in a position to capitalise. Personally I'd be very happy with 900-950k x 6 years. You only need to see how we play when he's on vs off the field, he's every bit a million dollar player and he's not a lazy **** like Fifita. His maturity and consistency for his age is something I've never seen from a forward.
I just don’t see how he would be unhappy with $6m over 6 years. It’s a good deal for him and as many have said it makes more sense for him than to chase money elsewhere and miss out on that increase for the next 3 years.

The only way it goes wrong is if it isn’t just about money but that he’s unhappy at the club, or if there is a scheme unfolding to get out of his contract early.

This is a total fabrication of my imagination but I do have a slight bad feeling that Gould is trying to find space in the Dogs cap already. Even though they just cleaned the decks and started the rebuild. It’s likely Gould just isn’t happy with the way they’ve spent on the rebuild or that they are trying find more money for a hooker or halfback, but part of me has a fear they are working on finding cash for Payne.
 

Unread

Active Now

  • leish107
  • Foordy
  • Strop
  • Manofoneway
  • kman
  • BRC088
  • Mr Fourex
  • Santa
  • Johnny92
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.