Gaz
NRL Captain
Contributor
- Oct 7, 2017
- 3,639
- 4,718
NRL.com saying live stream of Broncos presser at 9.15am.
No he's being punished for not helping them investigate. A more mature response would be this is what I saw and I know my brother did the wrong thing I am working with him to fix this and I know he's been suspended twice.......
Let's fix this behaviour.
I wonder if he'd be sitting out games if he'd taken that approach......
He's not legally obligated to say anything, but he is contractually obligated. The same contract that nets him a cool $3 million.
He might by looking out for his brother, but maybe his dickhead brother should be looking out for Payne too.
Might be 9.15 EDT.
Further, he stayed out of a fight his brother was in. I’m not a violent bloke but if my brother is in a fight I’m throwing hands. He showed a level of maturity for a 19 year old and he’s being punished. He’d have been better laying it on a couple of blokes and being suspended for 6 if staying out of a fight gets you 4. **** me dead.
You don't get it do you. He's not getting in trouble for what happened to his family or anyone. He's in trouble because he didn't talk to the integrity unit when he was asked to.
And that’s worth $20k and 4 weeks?
And why should he have to after he was cleared of all wrongdoing. It should have ended there as far as he was concerned.You don't get it do you. He's not getting in trouble for what happened to his family or anyone. He's in trouble because he didn't talk to the integrity unit when he was asked to.
And why should he have to after he was cleared of all wrongdoing. It should have ended there as far as he was concerned.
It might say in his contract with the NRL that he has to. It might be a club policy that he has to. The club might have said to him that morning "You have to".
There is no timeline for you to actually know when he was cleared, and when the NRL requested to find out what happened. The issue is, he denied them that. He could have said "I didn't do anything, I didn't see it" but he didn't. He refused.
If you were involved in an incident out of work, and people were able to ID you as being a known person in Company X, you best believe HR are getting involved to make sure you aren't dragging the company and their name through the mud.
If the same thing happened at my work hr would want to talk with me. If I spoke tp them and said I was just there, not in any fight or involved at all I'd be fine. If I refused to talk to them about it there'd be disciplinary action taken.You’re fabricating things to prove a point. I’m just going off what we do know and that is that he did nothing wrong
You’re fabricating things to prove a point. I’m just going off what we do know and that is that he did nothing wrong
Pretty sure White said that's not true. The story that he didn't talk to them is incorrect.You don't get it do you. He's not getting in trouble for what happened to his family or anyone. He's in trouble because he didn't talk to the integrity unit when he was asked to.