Why can't the Dragons put him at 9. That kid who busted his knee was the heir apparent this year. They have a potentially fantastic spine either way next year, just no good backs to finish anything off.
It's called physics.That fucking tackle on Taumalolo, holy ****. Strongest forward in the game, and Hunt just pulls and throws him like he's nothing.
It's called physics.
Can't be ignored either that Hunt is having a nice 25 minute rest to start the game, McCullough has made 20 tackles by then. Hunt comes on and has a scoot and that's his job but he isn't doing the full 100% of his role is he?
Just like Berrigan they have a limited time and they are using it, but you can't compare them to other hookers until they're doing the full job.
It's more the not able to defend in the ruck early that makes it a unfair comparison. The effect of that is him being off the field. That's 50% of your job as a hooker.
Bit like saying I am a better opening batsman than him but can I come in at nine so I don't face any fresh bowlers.
I am not bagging Hunt, he has to be protected from that and can't play 80 minutes in the ruck but you can't compare him to guys that are in there that's not a fair comparison.
Mcinnes has been one of the dragons best this year. One of the biggest reasons for their great run of form at the start of the year, gets the forwards running onto it at pace and great defensivelyMcInnes might need a new club now. Spine of Dufty, Hutchison, Widdop and Hunt. Not bad.
Hunt must NEVER play at 9 for the Dragons.
EVER!
For SVRL reasons.
Would definitely be a better hooker than McCullough if he played there full time. Has everything you need.
How much better do we look now with a REAL dummyhalf
You have to be like water.
Definitely played better than that mug Granville. Don't see what people see in that guy other than being 'quick' of the mark.
Definitely played better than that mug Granville. Don't see what people see in that guy other than being 'quick' of the mark.