W
winnie_992
NYC Player
- Mar 5, 2008
- 147
- 0
With a new CEO coming in and after reading this article about players including Locky not being happy with Ivans coaching it got me thinking if Ivan was shown the door who is available in 2011. It may just be a media beat up but it is the 2nd artivcle I have seen about players not being that happy
This thread isnt supposed to be about whether Ivan should or shouldnt be coach but rather a hypothetical if he was given the flick who is available?
This thread isnt supposed to be about whether Ivan should or shouldnt be coach but rather a hypothetical if he was given the flick who is available?
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 5914209116BRISBANE Broncos coach Ivan Henjak overruled captain Darren Lockyer's desperate plan to play against the Canberra Raiders on Friday night.
Revelations of the selection dispute came amid grumblings of a widespread rift between Henjak and his players as Brisbane missed the finals for the first time since 1991.
After demanding that Lockyer withdraw early last week, Henjak saw Brisbane's 18-year semi-finals streak come crashing down in just his second year in charge of the glamour club.
But departing CEO Bruno Cullen insists that while the six-time premiers will conduct a standard off-season review, the club remains committed to Henjak.
Despite tensions, Henjak is signed until the end of 2012 and continues to be viewed as a long-term coach.
"Ivan's stepped into the biggest shoes in rugby league over the past 20 years - having to follow an icon of the game like Wayne Bennett," Cullen said.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
"Last year, there were only four teams left and we were one of them, and this year he [was] still in the fight for the semi-finals [until the final round]. Two years of working really hard with a particularly young group, we think he's done really well."
In a development that is sure to sting Broncos fans, it has emerged that Henjak thwarted Lockyer's bid to play against Canberra with a rib injury.
The Test skipper could not be contacted, but it is believed he secretly pleaded with club staff to be given until match eve, last Thursday, to prove his fitness.
It is understood Lockyer was determined to defy pain and follow halfback Peter Wallace, who played with a shoulder injury that requires surgery.
But Henjak ordered Lockyer to pull the pin early in the week to limit distractions. The captain officially withdrew last Tuesday night, three days before the game.
Henjak's stance was supported by Cullen, who argued the club shouldn't risk Lockyer if he wasn't close to being fit.
"I don't think in his interests, if he's not right, that he should play," Cullen said. "Darren is a proud man and I'm sure he'll do everything he can to make it on the field."
Several Brisbane players have taken issue with other aspects of Henjak's perceived dictatorial approach.
The major sticking points are much deeper than this year's finishing position and extend to concerns over communication and man-management skills.
Worryingly, many senior players have been left frustrated by the lack of input they were given in the club's training and game-plan approach this year.
After his side's fate was sealed against Canberra, Henjak declared post-match that his players have steep lessons to learn.
"There's a lot of potential in that footy team, but if we don't put the effort in and learn a lot from this year, we'll end up in the same position we are now," Henjak said.
"There's still a lot of work to do to capitalise on the work we've done this year."
But Cullen has conceded Henjak and his coaching staff must also take stock as the club rebuilds.
"You're right, the coaching staff overall are fairly new at their jobs," Cullen said.
"Some have been around a while, but as head coaches, assistant coaches and trainers - we've got a young crop of budding coaches there as well.
"That's not a criticism, that's just a fact of life, and they will learn too.
"How we handle those sorts of things will be part of the end-of-year review."