Re: Anthony Milford, 1 or 6
Can someone explain their reasons why Milford's skillset is more suited to the halves than fullback?
Or is it just being desperate for another "Lockyer"?
This.
My memories of Milford's brilliance were from watching him play FB, and I will confess to salivating at the prospect of him playing FB for us, especially since FB last year was a problem for us as was 5/8. Then, I discovered he was selected as our next 5/8 which at the time ... and still now, mystifies me.
Then comes the comparison to Lockyer, and I am in complete agreement here with what Alec says, notwithstanding the fact I want another Lockyer ASAP. The fact is, Milford is no Lockyer, and for mine, to label his as the next Lockyer is unreasonable, at this stage unrealistic and also unfair on Milford.
It certainly makes for a great topic for debate and discussion sure, but my point is that I am getting a little impatient waiting for this side to cement it's key spine players so after how many seasons? we can start playing quality footie and the loyal fans on this forum can smile more than cry.
Morkel's (and other's) point about waiting until Milford and a bunch of others settle down and settle in is fair enough, but I for one would have enjoyed watching Milford add to this side his brilliance from the back, however many bombs he dropped in the past.
In any case, the die is cast, Milford is at 5/8, Boyd is the FB we had to have, and the bottom line is we will all have to wait like it or not, and laugh or cry as we do. I just hope there will be more smiles than tears sooner than later.