rnabokov
State of Origin Captain
Contributor
- Mar 5, 2008
- 9,586
- 8,889
Re: Round 8 - Broncos vs Eels
Totally disagree. Playing him at 5/8 was a mistake.
All the brilliance can be done as a FB, same as Slater, Moylan, Inglis. Milford is not ready, and won't be for a few seasons, as a 5/8. That he has been selected there, and all the ongoing justifications are excuses and wishful thinking. He is too immature for 5/8.
As Alec posted, not in these words, he is at his best as a 2nd 5/8 from the back - running rampant and play making with time and room and in his comfort zone until he gains confidence and experience, which will be helped enormously by his running game yielding results - again, like Slater, Moylan, Inglis.
I'd rather see Milf strutting his stuff as a play making FB and say Ash Taylor or Hunt playing 5/8.
Yes, it won't happen, and yes, this debate is stale, and yes, he will always be stuck at 5/8 and we will just have to wait and listen to all the justifications and excuses as we hope for miracles.
Milford is our 5/8. However, I don't have to like it or agree with the selection. It is just wrong wrong wrong
My take is that Anthony Milford as a Bronco, let alone as a five eighth is a work in progress.
Last night's performance was disappointing, but I'm not prepared to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Sure, he made 4 errors and I'd say two of those were inexcusable including the one that eventually lead to the Matt Cooper try but a lot of people are prepared to dismiss the positives as well. For starters, Anthony's short distance kicking game is one of the silkiest I've seen from a Broncos half in quite sometime and it forced 3 goal line drop outs last night which as you may know is like gold. Of course the Broncos didn't get the luxury of one of them as Dugan's drop punt had one of the luckiest bounces I've seen in a game of Rugby League but it was just one of those nights.
The other positive that I barely see mentioned is his passing before the line. Some of those passes he was throwing to Glenn and Reed were so smooth that I had no idea he had released the ball until his receivers would die with it.
Those are the type of plays that can be worked on.
What needs to be addressed is his role in the team. Perhaps one of the most frustrating plays in the game was watching Milford receive the ball on tackle two in the fifth minute with the intention of him hitting it up one off the ruck. Seriously, what a dumb play. I know that Milford is a very handy runner of the football but that sort of play shouldn't be attempted until late in the half and even then, it should be off a quick play the ball.
That play really exemplified where the Broncos have got it wrong with Milford. Yes, he should be running the ball, but it should be off other players, otherwise he should be putting the defence into two minds by ball-playing which he can do.
I agree that playing him at fullback wouldn't have made much of a difference if at all. Some of those mistakes, particularly the one that lead up to the Mike Cooper mistake weren't mistakes that were caused by playing as a five eighth. In fact, it was a second man play which is basically a fullback play in the modern game.
I'm prepared to give him the rest of the season to ply his trade at five eighth. I don't think it should be ended so quickly for a variety of reasons and I honestly believe we're yet to see the best of Anthony in that position.
One of the biggest hurdles Milford has to climb is that he has to live up to a highlights reel. Maybe I'm wrong but the way people go off about him, I swear all they've seen is videos like these...
and it's very selective. Some fans are holding him to an unrealistic standard and then using it to argue that the move was a mistake and going further with it.
To be honest, I've got no time for people when they act that way so I've stayed silent.
I'll end on this.
Is Milford the best five eighth at the club right now?
Yes.
Are our fullback stocks better than our five eighth stocks?
Yes.
There's your answer.
Totally disagree. Playing him at 5/8 was a mistake.
All the brilliance can be done as a FB, same as Slater, Moylan, Inglis. Milford is not ready, and won't be for a few seasons, as a 5/8. That he has been selected there, and all the ongoing justifications are excuses and wishful thinking. He is too immature for 5/8.
As Alec posted, not in these words, he is at his best as a 2nd 5/8 from the back - running rampant and play making with time and room and in his comfort zone until he gains confidence and experience, which will be helped enormously by his running game yielding results - again, like Slater, Moylan, Inglis.
I'd rather see Milf strutting his stuff as a play making FB and say Ash Taylor or Hunt playing 5/8.
Yes, it won't happen, and yes, this debate is stale, and yes, he will always be stuck at 5/8 and we will just have to wait and listen to all the justifications and excuses as we hope for miracles.
Milford is our 5/8. However, I don't have to like it or agree with the selection. It is just wrong wrong wrong
Last edited by a moderator: