NRL 2023 Round 10 Discussion

That Horsborough run was ridiculous. Not only because the Bulldogs were too afraid to go low, but then you have the sleeper in there pushing him forward.

That's the one trend I hate. Fair enough if you want to stop your team mate getting driven back, but helping them to an extra 15m and getting that momentum in the ruck? Ridiculous.
 
That Horsborough run was ridiculous. Not only because the Bulldogs were too afraid to go low, but then you have the sleeper in there pushing him forward.

That's the one trend I hate. Fair enough if you want to stop your team mate getting driven back, but helping them to an extra 15m and getting that momentum in the ruck? Ridiculous.
Yep... basically had a rolling maul going and then no one wanting to tackle the legs for fear of sin bin....

#RugbaLeeeeg
 
This is such a low quality game. Dogs back 3 have been awful.
 
A ball was caught on inside shoulder there and then the player ran behind the lead runner and passed it. Lead runner runs through the line, but it seems pretty similar to the Walsh try that got disallowed for catching it mm behind the lead runner
 
Warren Smith needs to piss off with his crap magic puns.. has said "magic trick" about 5 times already.

Go Away GIF
 
Sutton only reffing one side at the moment... and Mahoney got back behind the ruck anyway

1683277919455
 
[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]
3319.jpg
[/st_td_row][st_td]HK_Eagle - silvertails.net[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .August 6, 2011
MESSAGES: 7,748
Reaction Score: 10,525
[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
Wasn’t there some rule about receiving the pass inside a decoy runner and then running out past that point being an obstruction? Has that rule changed or am I messing up the interpretation… that Raider’s try seemed a pretty clear cut example, but not a peep.


 
What happened to two feet behind the line? Or is that not the rule when defending on your own try line?
 
Horse... is not a ball playing lock... blew a 4 on 1 overlap to take a hit up
 
[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]
3319.jpg
[/st_td_row][st_td]HK_Eagle - silvertails.net[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .August 6, 2011
MESSAGES: 7,748
Reaction Score: 10,525
[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]

Wasn’t there some rule about receiving the pass inside a decoy runner and then running out past that point being an obstruction? Has that rule changed or am I messing up the interpretation… that Raider’s try seemed a pretty clear cut example, but not a peep.



That's what I thought too
 
[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]
3319.jpg
[/st_td_row][st_td]HK_Eagle - silvertails.net[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .August 6, 2011
MESSAGES: 7,748
Reaction Score: 10,525
[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]

Wasn’t there some rule about receiving the pass inside a decoy runner and then running out past that point being an obstruction? Has that rule changed or am I messing up the interpretation… that Raider’s try seemed a pretty clear cut example, but not a peep.



Reece Walsh was penalised against cows... have not seen it again since
 

Active Now

  • broncsgoat
  • GCBRONCO
  • Robboi_321
  • leon.bott
  • beaseagull
  • Lostboy
  • sooticus
  • Skathen
  • BroncosAlways
  • Santa
  • Big Del
  • Battler
  • Lurker
  • Broncosarethebest
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.