It wouldn't be so bad if we still saw those old school, bone-crunching tackles that Tunza used to make, but we don't, so now basically everything is just going to be a wrestle-a-thon, which is boring and can actually end up being more dangerous than a shoulder charge in certain instances.
In light of all the concussion debate (especially in NFL) I think any contact with the head should be dealt with harshly. But banning the shoulder charge is not the way to go about protecting players.
wow this is so fucking stupid, if a shoulder charge goes wrong and there's contact with the head punish them accordingly but don't take the shoulder charge out of the game. I hope this doesn't end up like the rule in union where people are penalised for some of the softest hits ive ever seen just because they didn't wrap there arms.
Not a huge fan of banning the shoulder charge completely but I do think that if a players takes the risk and attempts a shoulder charge then they should be punished. Poor form from ARLC who have had a shocking day IMO.
No brainer - can't believe people could argue against this. You've been left behind if so.
The world has moved on from the 'she'll be right m8' attitude to head injuries. They are a serious problem. It's no sign of toughness to play on with a concussion - it's idiocy and irresponsibility at the hands of the club.
Let's be honest anyway, a shoulder charge rarely gets anyone flush as it is.
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.