NRL Players and family members in hot water

[Nashy]

Presumption of innocence ,nice sentiment and I totally agree it is the way it should be. What stuns me is, the people upholding the principle in this case were not even aware of its existence when the Cronulla players were accused of peptide use. A simple read of the posts back then has those same posters acting as judge and jury , labelling them with all sorts of names without a shred of evidence having been presented.

Which posts? I'd be interested to take a look to see what evidence had been released at the time for people to believe their had been peptide use.

 

[Nashy]

SKD has almost been out of the game for as long as the admitted drug cheats and he hasn't even been found guilty yet.

Pfft. Lets not forget that the NRL is looking after this. That administration that is flat out wiping it's own ass correctly, a banker who doesn't know the game, and an ARL Commission which is still made up of all the old boys of league holding the sport back.

 

[Huge]

No one gives a **** about the Sharks, why haven't you worked this out yet?

Because the Sharks are a club but the accusations made were against people, you know fellow human beings. What haven't you worked this out yet ?

 

[broncos4life]

Because the Sharks are a club but the accusations made were against people, you know fellow human beings. What haven't you worked this out yet ?

Sorry I meant the Sharks players, didn't realise that wasn't clear. I have amended my original post to reflect this.

 

[Nashy]

Because the Sharks are a club but the accusations made were against people, you know fellow human beings. What haven't you worked this out yet ?

But no reply to me? :bilmem:

 

[Porthoz]

But no reply to me? :bilmem:

It's not you the bait is for... :wink:

 

[Nashy]

It's not you the bait is for... :wink:

I'm not interested in games. I want to see the posts that [MENTION=1992]Huge[/MENTION] is talking about, so I can then go back and look to see what information was available to the public, to see if his criticism is warranted or not.

 

[Mr Fourex]

Because the Sharks are a club but the accusations made were against people, you know fellow human beings. What haven't you worked this out yet ?

>cough cough<

Grammar Nazi fail is huge.......

 

[Huge]

Comma missing ? Ha ha....some fail ! Sadly Mr Fourex you are mistaken ! It was a punctuation fail, not a grammar fail ! The grammar fail was 'grammar nazi fail is huge'.

 

[mieko]

>cough cough<

Grammar Nazi fail is huge.......

Zing! Still missed it and punctuation fail, he's a double threat!

just having some fun [MENTION=1992]Huge[/MENTION]?

 

[broncos4life]

This is amazing

 

[Huge]

Zing! Still missed it and punctuation fail, he's a double threat!

just having some fun @Huge?

Oh, please, I cannot stand it, illuminate me !

 

[Nashy]

Move on.

I guess I'm not getting those posts you speak of?

 

[jarro65]

6 game ban and $30 000 fine for Andrew Fafita.

So much for a hefty ban.

 

[Super Freak]

Does his time out get taken off that suspension?

 

[Cult]

Does his time out get taken off that suspension?

Yes, it's been backdated. Much like the other "suspensions" Cronulla have received.

 

[Huge]

Wow, 6 matches and thirty grand, whoever would have expected that ? Oh wait.... It seems as though cool heads prevailed after sitting back, taking all things into consideration and not rushing to judgement. What a novel idea !

 

[Huge]

Oh, and he must undertake an anger management course. Looks like the only thing I didn't forecast correctly was the public apology however that may come later ,on one of the footy shows or perhaps in an interview for the news. I thought the fine would be around $50,000 but near enough. Maybe there is something to being an old guy and waiting a while for emotion to subside before passing comment or judgement.