NRL Players and family members in hot water

I'm amazed at the inside knowledge you guys all have. ASADA and the NRL both stated the Sharks players were unaware of what was administered to them. Sandor Earl was trafficking in drugs as well as knowingly using ped's . The two offences are not the same as is demonstrated by the differing sentences. Mind you, all the internet experts may know better and the people who investigated and gathered evidence probably got it wrong. Pretty certain I know who is likely to be right.
 
I'm amazed at the inside knowledge you guys all have. ASADA and the NRL both stated the Sharks players were unaware of what was administered to them. Sandor Earl was trafficking in drugs as well as knowingly using ped's . The two offences are not the same as is demonstrated by the differing sentences. Mind you, all the internet experts may know better and the people who investigated and gathered evidence probably got it wrong. Pretty certain I know who is likely to be right.

Brace yourself Huge stick to your guns mate
 
I'm amazed at the inside knowledge you guys all have. ASADA and the NRL both stated the Sharks players were unaware of what was administered to them. Sandor Earl was trafficking in drugs as well as knowingly using ped's . The two offences are not the same as is demonstrated by the differing sentences. Mind you, all the internet experts may know better and the people who investigated and gathered evidence probably got it wrong. Pretty certain I know who is likely to be right.

Have you seen any of the interviews of Sandor Earl?

You should check them out sometime...
 
I'm amazed at the inside knowledge you guys all have. ASADA and the NRL both stated the Sharks players were unaware of what was administered to them. Sandor Earl was trafficking in drugs as well as knowingly using ped's . The two offences are not the same as is demonstrated by the differing sentences. Mind you, all the internet experts may know better and the people who investigated and gathered evidence probably got it wrong. Pretty certain I know who is likely to be right.

And the ARL/NRL had no idea that Joey Johns was popping pills for years.

Yet 95% of league fans knew about it.

Oh that's right, it was only ecstasy.

pigfly_banner1.jpg
 
I'm amazed at the inside knowledge you guys all have. ASADA and the NRL both stated the Sharks players were unaware of what was administered to them. Sandor Earl was trafficking in drugs as well as knowingly using ped's . The two offences are not the same as is demonstrated by the differing sentences. Mind you, all the internet experts may know better and the people who investigated and gathered evidence probably got it wrong. Pretty certain I know who is likely to be right.

I remember when I used to be this naive... I miss those days TBH.
 
I'm not going to comment on the different length of sentences , there's enough people doing that already but I'm fairly sure it is the players' responsibility to know exactly what they are being injected with . The fact the sharks' players didn't know what they were being injected with is a moot point . They should have known . Unless they were lied to ? I haven't followed it that closely .
 
I'm not going to comment on the different length of sentences , there's enough people doing that already but I'm fairly sure it is the players' responsibility to know exactly what they are being injected with . The fact the sharks' players didn't know what they were being injected with is a moot point . They should have known . Unless they were lied to ? I haven't followed it that closely .

This.
[MENTION=1992]Huge[/MENTION]. It's up to the players mate. It's simple. Earl got fucked, while the team got off.
 
I'm amazed at the inside knowledge you guys all have. ASADA and the NRL both stated the Sharks players were unaware of what was administered to them. Sandor Earl was trafficking in drugs as well as knowingly using ped's . The two offences are not the same as is demonstrated by the differing sentences. Mind you, all the internet experts may know better and the people who investigated and gathered evidence probably got it wrong. Pretty certain I know who is likely to be right.

the anti-doping rules don't say that you can dope as long as you pretend not to know what you are taking.

they flat out state that players are responsible for knowing exactly what they are taking. it is their responsibility.

and even if it is true that they were naive or gullible or what ever else you want to call it (and i for one don't beleive that they were that stupid as to not know they were doing something wrong) it still doesn't mean they get a 95% discount on their penalty for leniency.

stalling the investigation and denying, denying, denying before pleading guilty = 3 week suspension

co-operating the entire time and pleading guilty = 4 year suspension.

that is a joke
 
Oh sorry guys...I forgot I posted here on this subject but clearly some of you just can't get over things.

None, not one of you knows a fucking thing about what went on yet you're all so strident in your views. What's worse is you are convinced that you and your view is absolutely correct yet cannot for a single moment sit back and consider you may not know all the details and hell, maybe just maybe you could be wrong. That's the difference , you're perfect , your knowledge is complete and your view is the 'right' one. ****, if I didn't know better I'd think you were talking about religion because there are no more certain people than the indoctrinated.

I challenge any one of you to write ' I admit I can't possibly know all the details ' and actually tell the truth instead of spouting half truths based on scant details.

I know one thing.....I don't know all the details and that's a fair admission. I also know that there are some who do and they've investigated it to the hilt. Why the **** you lot cannot understand that those people are much much better informed than you and by extension much better positioned to pass a fair judgement . If Earl received a tough sentence it may be because he deserved it based on offences, actions and deeds that have not seen the light of day.Who knows ? Oh, that's right...the people who investigated it and saw the evidence.

That said I personally thought the Sharks players received punishments that were at the lighter end.
 
And the ARL/NRL had no idea that Joey Johns was popping pills for years.

Yet 95% of league fans knew about it.

Oh that's right, it was only ecstasy.

pigfly_banner1.jpg
I didn't know. I'm in the 5% apparently. Your post is evidence that you cannot reason capably. You make totally insane claims based on emotion and prejudice. If 95% of league fans knew I ask ,how did they know? Was it published, was there video, public admissions, police charges and court documents ? When did you 'know' ? You see , when you claim to 'know' something you would have evidence and according to you 95% of rugby league fans had evidence. What crap.
 
Oh sorry guys...I forgot I posted here on this subject but clearly some of you just can't get over things.

None, not one of you knows a fucking thing about what went on yet you're all so strident in your views. What's worse is you are convinced that you and your view is absolutely correct yet cannot for a single moment sit back and consider you may not know all the details and hell, maybe just maybe you could be wrong. That's the difference , you're perfect , your knowledge is complete and your view is the 'right' one. ****, if I didn't know better I'd think you were talking about religion because there are no more certain people than the indoctrinated.

I challenge any one of you to write ' I admit I can't possibly know all the details ' and actually tell the truth instead of spouting half truths based on scant details.

I know one thing.....I don't know all the details and that's a fair admission. I also know that there are some who do and they've investigated it to the hilt. Why the **** you lot cannot understand that those people are much much better informed than you and by extension much better positioned to pass a fair judgement . If Earl received a tough sentence it may be because he deserved it based on offences, actions and deeds that have not seen the light of day.Who knows ? Oh, that's right...the people who investigated it and saw the evidence.

That said I personally thought the Sharks players received punishments that were at the lighter end.

We do know what happened, actually. You don't need much detail.

- Sharks players unknowingly took performance enhancing drugs.
- Sharks players are responsible for what goes into their bodies
- Sharks players were given a ban that doesn't match the official sanctioned bans
 
We do know what happened, actually. You don't need much detail.

- Sharks players unknowingly took performance enhancing drugs.
- Sharks players are responsible for what goes into their bodies
- Sharks players were given a ban that doesn't match the official sanctioned bans

You forgot lied, stalled and refused to cooperate with the investigation. All of which are traits of an innocent party
 
You forgot lied, stalled and refused to cooperate with the investigation. All of which are traits of an innocent party

It's hard to prove those allegations. I just wanted to run with cold hard facts that can't be debated.
 
It's hard to prove those allegations. I just wanted to run with cold hard facts that can't be debated.
I totally agree . It's also a fact that the Sharks players don't and didn't set the penalty. All anger should be directed at those that do. It is entirely possible that those who did set the penalties know more than we do. The Sharks players quite understandably protested their innocence. I have no evidence that they lied or obstructed anyone or body. The facts are that they were investigated by two different groups ( not to forget the many privateers who snooped around, journalists etc )and were found to have unknowingly transgressed. If more evidence was found it would doubtless have surfaced by now.

Once again, it is not the players who set the penalties. Like all other courts, the penalty was set and the sentence served. Like all other courts, that's the end of proceedings. I don't know all the facts in both the Sharks case and earls case and no one here does either. How can a person believe that they can make a truly precise picture without all the facts ?
 

Active Now

  • Slippin Jimmy
  • Xzei
  • bb_gun
  • easybreezy
  • Foordy
  • broncos4life
  • Porthoz
  • leon.bott
  • broncoscope
  • lynx000
  • Bronco bob
  • NSW stables
  • Broncones
  • Harry Sack
  • Scdeac
  • Santa
  • Loch Ness Monster
  • Battler
  • Jedhead
  • heartly87
... and 13 more.
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.