Positive drugs test

[Ari Gold]

Seems to be some sort of performance enhacing thing instead of illegal drugs which was first thought.

I'd be asking my dealer for a refund if that's the case.

 

[Playboy Bunny]

[quote="Playboy Bunny":1837skz7]Seems to be some sort of performance enhacing thing instead of illegal drugs which was first thought.

What an idiot...

Really? Performance enhancing is worse IMO.[/quote:1837skz7]

Yeah apparently some sort of steroid or something

 

[Flutterby]

Yep Clenbuterol - an anabolic agent used to improve muscle mass and reduce body fat

 

[Nashy]

Is he really that stupid.

He will be banned from sport. Good work you fucking moron.

 

[Coxy]

I like how they assumed a positive drugs test of a league player had to be recreational drugs, before checking the facts and realising it was performance enhancing.

 

[Foordy]

The former international tested positive to Clenbuterol, an anabolic agent used to improve muscle mass and reduce body fat, following a routine Australian Sports Drug Agency test three weeks ago.

http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,865 ... 66,00.html

glad he didn't come to us as was talked about before the season started.

 

[Je$ter]

Unless his B sample is clear he will be gone for 2 years.

Clen is more of a fat stripper than mass gainer, but still helps increase strength.

And I am willing to bet he isn't the only player in the NRL taking performance enhancing drugs.

 

[schmix]

Cronulla Sharks' chief executive Tony Zappia said the string of events had personally brought him to breaking point.

"Personally, I don't think I can take any more,'' he said.

His has gotta be the worst job in Australia at the moment.

I like how they assumed a positive drugs test of a league player had to be recreational drugs, before checking the facts and realising it was performance enhancing.

I think they call that the "Andrew Johns Effect".

 

[Je$ter]

[quote="Je$ter":15g9l4dp]And I am willing to bet he isn't the only player in the NRL taking performance enhancing drugs.

Probably not, but would it really be worth taking the risk? That's what I don't understand.[/quote:15g9l4dp]

I suppose that comes down to the individual - like there is no doubt they work well, so if that to them outweighs the proposition of ruining their career then they will run the risk of it.

Then again, if your club is not in the semi-finals if you took a 6-week cycle of anabolics and still went to the gym, by the time pre-season there would be little or no trace of them in the system. However, some of the gains made whilst cycling would be lost. ie, say you get your bench up to 150kg on, you might lose 10-15kg or something on that.

Then again there is HGH - undectable by urine testing, has a lot of benefits for the athlete.

 

[Foordy]

Unless his B sample is clear he will be gone for 2 years.

Clen is more of a fat stripper than mass gainer, but still helps increase strength.

And I am willing to bet he isn't the only player in the NRL taking performance enhancing drugs.

I can't recall of ever hearing about an athlete whose A sample is positive but B sample is negative

 

[Je$ter]

Yeah the chances are slim, pretty much just a stall for time.

 

[Coxy]

Unless his B sample is clear he will be gone for 2 years.

Clen is more of a fat stripper than mass gainer, but still helps increase strength.

And I am willing to bet he isn't the only player in the NRL taking performance enhancing drugs.

Yep, so that makes it right, huh?

 

[Black Philip]

Unless his B sample is clear he will be gone for 2 years.

Clen is more of a fat stripper than mass gainer, but still helps increase strength.

And I am willing to bet he isn't the only player in the NRL taking performance enhancing drugs.

Yep, so that makes it right, huh?

Are you baiting or being a dickhead? He didn't say that nor did he imply it.

 

[Je$ter]

Unless his B sample is clear he will be gone for 2 years.

Clen is more of a fat stripper than mass gainer, but still helps increase strength.

And I am willing to bet he isn't the only player in the NRL taking performance enhancing drugs.

Yep, so that makes it right, huh?

Yeah for sure, in fact they are silly if they aren't taking something. Anything to gain that edge!

 

[Kimlo]

April 2, 2009 : Tony Zappia says "Reni must have felt the Sharks was the place to change his ways because it wasn't happening with the discipline at the Bulldogs. Reni can obviously see the benefit of playing in a disciplined environment like we have at the Sharks."

I lol'd, unfair dismissal case? lmaoooo, can't afford to pay phone bills? I wonder why.
Seriously, I have zero sympathy for idiots like this.

 

[Kimlo]

Unless his B sample is clear he will be gone for 2 years.

Clen is more of a fat stripper than mass gainer, but still helps increase strength.

And I am willing to bet he isn't the only player in the NRL taking performance enhancing drugs.

Yep, so that makes it right, huh?

Coxy baiting again.... :roll:

 

[Nashy]

Unless his B sample is clear he will be gone for 2 years.

Clen is more of a fat stripper than mass gainer, but still helps increase strength.

And I am willing to bet he isn't the only player in the NRL taking performance enhancing drugs.

Yep, so that makes it right, huh?

Coxy baiting again.... :roll:

That wasn't a bait. If so, Coxy needs to be ashamed [icon_confu

 

[Coxy]

Not a bait. It's just a trend I've seen with Jester.

Players busted having group sex in toilet. His justification: everyone does it.
Player busted taking drugs. His justification: everyone does it.

Whenever something like this is reported he feels compelled to note that they're not the only ones.

So? Does that mean we shouldn't bust them?

It's just a pointless thing to say.