schmix
NRL Player
- Mar 4, 2008
- 2,799
- 33
So good they're the best AND second best?
LOL, I meant just behind the Broncos.schmix said:So good they're the best AND second best?
The Gymp said:Roosters are safe because they have a dumb owner who continually puts up with financial losses to support a team of bums.
Seeing as Souths will be the only Sydney team who is making a profit this year and this is without a leagues club grant, then no.broncosil said:The Gymp said:Roosters are safe because they have a dumb owner who continually puts up with financial losses to support a team of bums.
Are you sure you're not talking about Souths? [icon_razz1 [icon_lol1.
Twiztid said:Seeing as Souths will be the only Sydney team who is making a profit this year and this is without a leagues club grant, then no.broncosil said:The Gymp said:Roosters are safe because they have a dumb owner who continually puts up with financial losses to support a team of bums.
Are you sure you're not talking about Souths? [icon_razz1 [icon_lol1.
Twiztid said:Membership, sponsorship, events, ANZ agreement takings, merchandise, streamlined staff and the business to run better and smarter etc. I don't think Russell or Peter have put much money into the club for a while.
Almost all clubs in NSW rely on the grants from the Leagues club to cover the short falls. Roosters and Cronulla are probably the worst hit this year for having to be dug out by their leagues clubs with million dollar grants to make the loss look better.
You offering your services to the club?The Gymp said:Fair enough I will take your word for it, at least you have some business people and sugar daddies to fall back on if things go sour.
broncospwn said:Bulldogs are financially very strong actually, just behind the Bulldogs. The roosters are far from that.
Nashy said:And I'm sure Camp Quality is actually being supported by the Bulldogs.