K
kluppy
QCup Player
- Feb 2, 2010
- 273
- 177
suck it Jason, none from one motherfucker, woooooooo!!!!
i dont like jd much but **** me these questions from the media are a joke lol.
This post shows exactly how stupid you can be. He didn't put us under pressure because he didn't have his hands in any ruck you twat. You even know this but persist with your bullshit. He made an error in a ptb but it was upfield and we weren't under any real pressure before or after.You know the old mule is pacing around like a flustered grandma when he has to reply twice to the same post. RK is great value for what he is being paid but to pretend he didn't put us under pressure, twice, when the game is in the balance is... well... something you'd do. Go to bed and dream of Kennedy's hands knocking your balls around in the ruck as you whisper gently in his ear "6 again my prince".
Especially when he isn't. I always allow for the possibility but I am not wrong that RK didn't 'give away a 6 again ' for a mistake or stupid play. Just as it happened on another occasion, (Farnworth) contact was made while tackling. It was not an error or stupidity. It was a late call by the ref undoubtedly tipped through the earpiece.I'll give you the tip, he doesn't respond well to the insinuation that he could be wrong.
Nah, try was ok, was close, but ok.Anyone have any doubts about Oates' try? I think he might have clipped the sideline with his leg just before he put it down.
It's actually a rule I fucking hate too - unintentional knock down with your arm in the act of tackling with your head literally on the other side of the bloke. It's a joke rule, likely only existing because how do you tell the unintentional apart from the intentional.Especially when he isn't. I always allow for the possibility but I am not wrong that RK didn't 'give away a 6 again ' for a mistake or stupid play. Just as it happened on another occasion, (Farnworth) contact was made while tackling. It was not an error or stupidity. It was a late call by the ref undoubtedly tipped through the earpiece.
Ideally they are both out of the team when Hetho and Flegler are back.
Yeah, it's a bit of a shit rule but it's been around so long and isn't too big of an issue so it doesn't get much attention. At the time, before the ptb had even started or rather a tackle made Cook was signalling 6 again and another Souths player was too and even Voss was talking/asking was the ball touched so it wasn't shit play from RK.It's actually a rule I fucking hate too - unintentional knock down with your arm in the act of tackling with your head literally on the other side of the bloke. It's a joke rule, likely only existing because how do you tell the unintentional apart from the intentional.
I think the fairest way to deal with it, is if they can't change it to be the same as the other "not played at" rules, simply make it a scrum, restarting on the exact same tackle they were already on. Why should you get a fresh set because you chuck it into someone's arm, it's a terrible rule.
While on the soapbox, why don't they change the fucking charge down rules while they are at it. Reward charge downs by not resetting the tackle count. If you pull off a wicked play and charge down a kick that will almost certainly fall closer to the opposition, why should you be punished for that giving away another set if they gather it back up.
Everyones changed their tone after one game I see, typical broncoshq. We need to stop stressing and have abit of faith
Patty
57 minutes
17 hit ups
19 runs
182 metres
77 post contact metres
32 tackles
No misses
Nah, try was ok, was close, but ok.
View attachment 17323
Still in play and left hip is just about on the grass, he had the ball down.
View attachment 17324
Any delay in getting that ball down though and his right boot would have been out for sure.