PRE-GAME [Round 10, 2022] Manly vs Broncos

Status
Not open for further replies.
If the rain comes, we should put the biggest bench possible on. Manly are already light in the starting 13.

I'm fairly certain it's gonna be beefy regardless

14. Paix
15. Flegler
16. Kennedy
17. Jenson
 
He would definitely be in our side. He's a better bench middle than Kennedy, and arguably Palasia. Hopefully Manly get to full strength and use him in the middle where he should be.
Have you watched any manly games this year? Whilst he has more talent than Kennedy, Kennedy is without a doubt playing better then him this year. And Kennedy isn't even making our starting 17 this week...
 
I reckon we are looking at:

1. Martin
2. Oates
3. Staggs
4. Farnworth
5. Cobbo (Pereira if the Illuminati Unit do their usual Broncos thing)
6. Gamble
7. Reynolds
8. Carrigan
9. Walters
10. Haas
11. Capewell
12. Riki
13. Hetherington

14. Paix
15. Flegler
16. Jensen
17. Robati/Kennedy

Strong strong side.
 
I reckon we are looking at:

1. Martin
2. Oates
3. Staggs
4. Farnworth
5. Cobbo (Pereira if the Illuminati Unit do their usual Broncos thing)
6. Gamble
7. Reynolds
8. Carrigan
9. Walters
10. Haas
11. Capewell
12. Riki
13. Hetherington

14. Paix
15. Flegler
16. Jensen
17. Robati/Kennedy

Strong strong side.
I want to fit Palasia into the side and by all accounts he deserves to be there but I'm happy with that side even though you've sat on the fence with Kennedy and TC.

Cobbs will play as the NRL already cleared this incident weeks ago.
 
I reckon we are looking at:

1. Martin
2. Oates
3. Staggs
4. Farnworth
5. Cobbo (Pereira if the Illuminati Unit do their usual Broncos thing)
6. Gamble
7. Reynolds
8. Carrigan
9. Walters
10. Haas
11. Capewell
12. Riki
13. Hetherington

14. Paix
15. Flegler
16. Jensen
17. Robati/Kennedy

Strong strong side.
I think Robati might snag the final bench spot... no blight on Kennedy only that Robati offers the ability to cover second row if needed.

That team must be close to a full strength though... probably only 6 up in the air, but we dont really have a standout option except maybe TMM
 
I want to fit Palasia into the side and by all accounts he deserves to be there but I'm happy with that side even though you've sat on the fence with Kennedy and TC.

Cobbs will play as the NRL already cleared this incident weeks ago.

The Intellectually-deficient Unit though will likely change their mind now it is out in the media. Never underestimate their ability to screw something up even when you think they can't.
 

The club really seems happy again.

He's no Cherry-Evans but I have to admit I'm surprised at how well spoken Riki is. Enjoyed listening to that.
 
I reckon we are looking at:

1. Martin
2. Oates
3. Staggs
4. Farnworth
5. Cobbo (Pereira if the Illuminati Unit do their usual Broncos thing)
6. Gamble
7. Reynolds
8. Carrigan
9. Walters
10. Haas
11. Capewell
12. Riki
13. Hetherington

14. Paix
15. Flegler
16. Jensen
17. Robati/Kennedy

Strong strong side.
I would go with Palasia before Robati. It shows how quickly you blokes turn on players. But quite honestly I think this club owes a lot to Jensen and Palasia because they have single handedly shown that they are willing and capable to get through work that Haas does and I think have subsequently lowered Haas' value or even the notion that the Broncos need Haas to win. Palasia for mine is significantly better than Kennedy and Robati (through the middle, the edge is a different story) and can be relied upon for large minutes, short bursts as well as being able to play anywhere in the forward pack with experience at NRL level and cup in all 3 positions. Keenan also recently turned down a life changing offer from Manly considering his previous injury issues to stay loyal. It is a close call but I think he is better and more versatile than Kennedy and we saw what q-cup did for the confidence in Robati's game so I think he should spend more time there than a 10 minute stint in NRL every week.
 
It shows how quickly you blokes turn on players

Deadset, just because a guy doesn't make a full strength squad (in my opinion) doesn't mean I've turned on him. Seriously, do you want 20 guys named per position? If Palasia misses out, he is EXTREMELY unlucky and it certainly isn't because he isn't good enough, he very clearly is. This is the benefit of competition for spots. Just right now, I think we are better served by the explosivity of Kennedy (which has been a real difference maker the last few weeks) or Robati after doing so well last week.

If Palasia gets picked, good on him and well deserved, I will be very happy for him and absolutely no issues with it whatsoever. How is that 'turning on him'?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Active Now

  • leish107
  • upthebroncs
  • ChewThePhatt
  • Ffs...
  • kman
  • Gaz
  • Tmac
  • Waynesaurus
  • bb_gun
  • BRC088
  • Broncosgirl
  • phoenix
  • leith1
  • GCBRONCO
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.