Round 10 Discussion

I thought the Warriors normally dominated the under 20's comp?
 
I thought the Warriors normally dominated the under 20's comp?

Despite winning the premiership in 2014, they haven't been that dominant during the regular season for sometime. Generally they're in the mix, but they're struggling this season, probably because they're without two of their best prospect Abbey (Bulldogs) and Hingano (NSW Cup).

It's also the NYC, turbulence is just part the parcel.
 
Can we all agree that McCullough is at least a better hooker than Wallace?

Shocking pass...
 
Peter Wallace, at times, looks about 45 years old.
 
I haven't seen this mentioned yet but I really like how the refs are just awarding the try on the spot without going to the video. It's been an annoyance to me how often they go to the video in the past couple of years so I'm really liking how they are just letting the game flow on by just using the video ref when it's really needed. Credit to the refs for doing this.
 
Gee the Warriors make some poor last tackle decisions.
 
I seriously want to know if the NRL have 2 sets of rules, one for the superstars and one for the toilers and battlers. How was GI not put on report for this? I personally think that they are just to scared to do anything to the superstars because they are the poster boys and they think they are perfect.

Home | Live Scores & Latest News | Fox Sports
I looked at it multiple times and although it was a wee bit suspect it wouldn't have even been noticed had the tackled player been facing any other way. It just looked like a natural progression without any malice but I can accept that others might not agree. For me, penalty sufficient for being a bit careless.
 
Storm have hit back quick in this match, 2 quick tries has shifted momentum in this game.
 
Uh, that Proctor try wasn't even grounded and they didn't even bother taking 2 looks at it.
 
Johns making his trademark pathetic comments.
 
It looked sweet to me?

Look again.

On the 4 angles they had up none of them showed the ball on the ground, and they didn't even bother looking at it twice.
 
It was a try.

Thank you for your valuable contribution, unfortunately the discussion is whether there was a visual on the ball touching the grass in the in-goal area, of which there was not.

CiZwbnTUoAAx2j2.jpg:large


Top left shows the ball touching the grass before the line, the next few frames are of the ball lifting up and Thurston getting a hand underneath it as momentum takes him into the in-goal.
 

Unread

Active Now

  • GCBRONCO
  • beaseagull
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.