McHunt
International Rep
Contributor
- Aug 25, 2018
- 17,938
- 31,006
That's not it at all. The issue for those of us not lavishing praise on Billy, is not that he's not good for a "cheap player" it's that we think we deserve better than a "cheap player" in our spine, when we only have one wise old head in it and he's liable to go down lame at any minute.Also, Billy had a cracking game, he is so underrated it is ridiculous. He isn't an elite hooker but he is a very good one and his defense is extremely underrated. 46 tackles in the middle against that pack with only 2 misses and decent service plus some great niggle and a willingness to stand up for his teammates, what more do you want from a cheap player? Having a cheap, very serviceable 9 means we can spend money elsewhere. He is giving great bang for buck. The vitriol against him is ridiculous.
We need more from dummy half than two "cheap players." We need one who can take over the reigns from Reynolds until Mam, Madden and Walsh are wiser, and someone on the bench who can threaten tired forwards in the way Soni Luke did to us. Or rather than "need" it's what we'd like ideally.
We can get by with Billy and Paix, but we're unlikely to beat the top 4 teams without Reynolds calling the shots. And even then it's 50:50.