Big Pete
International Captain
- Mar 12, 2008
- 32,135
- 25,808
What did you say Coxy?!
Let's settle this at Parramatta stadium.
Let's settle this at Parramatta stadium.
Big Pete said:What did you say Coxy?!
Let's settle this at Parramatta stadium.
The Brizz said:I loved the commitment in defense because that is what won the 2 points, Wallace was again crap (the try assist was a corker line run from Gillett which made Wallace throw the hold up pass) I just don't get his continual inclusion. Sammy was much better and in general the commitment was so much better, I think we really caught a side expecting to beat us by surprise and we need to lift more to win week in week out.
While I don't agree, he was outstanding in defence and the try he set up was pretty much the game breaking try that set the team on fire. IMO Wallace will improve over the next few weeks as his confidence increases but a lot of it depends on McCullough and Hannant leading the forward pack so the halves have time and space.Bucking Beads said:Courier mail reporting that wallace had a great game. Can anyone explain that to me.?
It's not that he's a bad player, just that he really doesn't offer anything.PETERN said:Too much negativity towards Beale - he mightn't not have done anything exceptional within the first two rounds but he has been fairly solid IMO.
Jack Reed has been a great find however!
Je$ter said:A win is a win but it was a pretty ordinary game tbh!
Forwards still lack a bit of startch imo.
Can't agree with that. The forwards won us the game, even after losing Anderson and pretty much Te'o...Je$ter said:A win is a win but it was a pretty ordinary game tbh!
Forwards still lack a bit of startch imo.
Jeba said:Bucking Beads said:Courier mail reporting that wallace had a great game. Can anyone explain that to me.?
Well it wasn't really a game where the halves could stand out. Was all about defence and forwards. He steered us around well, and probably the best of the 4 halves on the field. Obviously he needs to improve but it was a step in the right direction at least.
Big Pete said:Gagai had a bit of a shocker, but it was to be expected. Greasy Canberra night up against one of the best under the high ball, hardly a great position to be in. He's still a fast bugger and good at making metres through the middle. Once he settles in, he'll be a real weapon for us.
Beale still makes me feel very nervous and doesn't exactly have the size nor speed to cut it.
Bucking Beads said:Jeba said:[quote="Bucking Beads":1825nyh8]Courier mail reporting that wallace had a great game. Can anyone explain that to me.?
Well it wasn't really a game where the halves could stand out. Was all about defence and forwards. He steered us around well, and probably the best of the 4 halves on the field. Obviously he needs to improve but it was a step in the right direction at least.
Kemp wouldn't have done any better against Ferguson yesterday without protection. At least Gagai interfered! Worst part is that if you watch the replays, it's Beale who nudges Gagai in the just enough to make him miss the ball when the Raiders scored. [icon_nonjjoyce said:Big Pete said:Gagai had a bit of a shocker, but it was to be expected. Greasy Canberra night up against one of the best under the high ball, hardly a great position to be in. He's still a fast bugger and good at making metres through the middle. Once he settles in, he'll be a real weapon for us.
Beale still makes me feel very nervous and doesn't exactly have the size nor speed to cut it.
i dunno how it is expected. so i guess we have to accept he will have a few shockers (what is it two tries in two games?) until he turns into this NRL weapon everyone keeps talking about. with the team we have atm i dunno if we can carry people until they find their feet however long that may take.
draggx said:Je$ter said:A win is a win but it was a pretty ordinary game tbh!
Forwards still lack a bit of startch imo.
Forwards won that game for us, IMO with only 2 on the bench they did incredibly well and in the second half dominated that game.
With hannant to come back and Anderson now as well our forward pack is going to really click and should with confidence dominate a few more teams.
Porthoz said:Kemp wouldn't have done any better against Ferguson yesterday without protection. At least Gagai interfered! Worst part is that if you watch the replays, it's Beale who nudges Gagai in the just enough to make him miss the ball when the Raiders scored. [icon_nonjjoyce said:Big Pete said:Gagai had a bit of a shocker, but it was to be expected. Greasy Canberra night up against one of the best under the high ball, hardly a great position to be in. He's still a fast bugger and good at making metres through the middle. Once he settles in, he'll be a real weapon for us.
Beale still makes me feel very nervous and doesn't exactly have the size nor speed to cut it.
i dunno how it is expected. so i guess we have to accept he will have a few shockers (what is it two tries in two games?) until he turns into this NRL weapon everyone keeps talking about. with the team we have atm i dunno if we can carry people until they find their feet however long that may take.
Not saying Gagai hadn't a shocker, but if you're gonna put a rookie winger against Ferguson, make sure he gets support under the bombs!
I thought pretty much any forward deserved the points ahead of any of the backs last night, although Yow Yeh's try was a beauty. I do think that out of the ball players, Wallace was the best on the park last night.