alot of it comes from the same stuff every time, sloppy tackles by front rowers.Seriously how many times this year have we scored and made an error the following set allowing teams back into the game. It’s like it’s a curse. That’s my only negative from the game today.
Rugby league media is full of incoherent former players
I’m cautious of healping too much praise given our ability to fluctuate so much between good and bad form but the biggest positives from this game for me were:
1. Gamble’s short kicking game has translated to first grade. The 10-30m kicks were his bread and butter in ressies and he’s now bringing that to first grade which is what I originally hoped he’d bring when he got the call up.
2. The last 2 games Riki has returned to the early career form that had us all excited. This is also thanks to great service from Gamble and the threat of Staggs but what a dynamic player he is when he’s on. Hopefully this is the new standard. The one shame is that he seems far stronger playing on the right - this is also Capewell’s stronger side but hopefully with Cape’s experience he transition successfully to left like he does in origin
3. Defence has far improved. I now feel confident the right edge will withstand what is thrown at them and likewise the middle. Our left side is still our biggest issue but at at the risk of igniting a Huge thread derail, I have been mostly impressed with Herbie and Oates and this should improve further with the removal of Croft.Edit: that being said I think tonight was Croft’s best game in a long time and he played his role well outside of a below NRL standard kicking game.
The biggest concern from that game IMO was Haas. Although he still outperformed most forwards dream performances he looked far less effective than he has in previous weeks. Whether this is a case of losing motivation, being worn out from carrying the team, or Cowboys d’ing up on him I’m not sure but to me he didn’t seem like the Haas we’ve all grown to expect. That being said he still got 1 or my 3 votes in the player of the round thread.
I heard that too, but I'm not sure he caught the question right. It was a weird question and maybe he thought they meant what percentage of the time they are putting in. I mean he also can't know what the other players are thinking. To be honest though, what a stupid question. Ummmm 100%? 110%? It didn't deserve an answer.One other thing I feel worth mentioning was Croft’s post game presser on 9. When asked “it feels like more of the team are playing for each other. What percentage of the team do you think is putting In for each other? Croft said “I can’t put a % on it”. that’s a concern.
The biggest concern from that game IMO was Haas. Although he still outperformed most forwards dream performances he looked far less effective than he has in previous weeks. Whether this is a case of losing motivation, being worn out from carrying the team, or Cowboys d’ing up on him I’m not sure but to me he didn’t seem like the Haas we’ve all grown to expect. That being said he still got 1 or my 3 votes in the player of the round thread.
Just needs a little autotune.I mean, how could that ever motivate the players? I would almost want to lose than be obligated to sing that crap when I'm buzzing from a win.
Who the **** is Tom DeardenSolid performance. Tom Dearden re-writing the history books for most games last as a starting halfback for sure. How dumb were the cowboys. On a decent winning run, sign Dearden and haven’t won since haha.
How good was it to see the team respond to it and put them back in the game, resilience was much better instead of just giving up.Seriously how many times this year have we scored and made an error the following set allowing teams back into the game. It’s like it’s a curse. That’s my only negative from the game today.
How does this guy get a commentary gig? Only listened to 2 Origin games this year and he is useless.
Totally agree. It was a stupid question from a certified idiot. What was Croft supposed to say? "Yeah 83.4% of us are playing for each other at the moment. It's great that we've lost Lodge and TPJ as that percentage would have been lower if they were playing".I heard that too, but I'm not sure he caught the question right. It was a weird question and maybe he thought they meant what percentage of the time they are putting in. I mean he also can't know what the other players are thinking. To be honest though, what a stupid question. Ummmm 100%? 110%? It didn't deserve an answer.
That makes it stupid to us but exactly what the media would love to hear. How much air time and how many column inches could they churn out about the split camp at the Broncos or similar?Totally agree. It was a stupid question from a certified idiot. What was Croft supposed to say? "Yeah 83.4% of us are playing for each other at the moment. It's great that we've lost Lodge and TPJ as that percentage would have been lower if they were playing".
Yep, agree. He answered it well and gave them nothingThat makes it stupid to us but exactly what the media would love to hear. How much air time and how many column inches could they churn out about the split camp at the Broncos or similar?