Fozz
International Captain
Senior Staff
- Mar 4, 2008
- 27,021
- 16,933
View attachment 12006
Poor Trent
Can't beleive we have to wait for Round 22 for Slapfest 2: The slappening.
View attachment 12006
Poor Trent
I actually feel sorry for him. That is one bog average squad with a 3/4 like cotric that is completely wasted.View attachment 12006
Poor Trent
We got like 5 6 agains and 2-3 penalties in the first half....from memory. Someone will probably call me out on those stats.In hindsight it's probably no surprise the first half was boring (as far as I could tell, I was listening on the radio). Didn't Our Man Carrigan drop the ball in the first couple of minutes? My guess is that they all felt their ballsacks shrivelling and decided not to take ANY risks with the ball, just boring high-percentage football. The question is whether it helped us, by way of creating superior possession stats and wearing our opposition down (hence the flurry at the end), or whether it was decided that we needed more ball movement to score points and we abandoned No Risk Football at the end. Any opinions of whether the style of play changed before the points, or whether it was just a case of eventually wearing them down?
It wasn’t so much as no risk in the 1st half, more a case of no skillIn hindsight it's probably no surprise the first half was boring (as far as I could tell, I was listening on the radio). Didn't Our Man Carrigan drop the ball in the first couple of minutes? My guess is that they all felt their ballsacks shrivelling and decided not to take ANY risks with the ball, just boring high-percentage football. The question is whether it helped us, by way of creating superior possession stats and wearing our opposition down (hence the flurry at the end), or whether it was decided that we needed more ball movement to score points and we abandoned No Risk Football at the end. Any opinions of whether the style of play changed before the points, or whether it was just a case of eventually wearing them down?
As soon as we got some points we got our confidence back and we just ran over the top of them. It was literally just a matter of scoring and getting confidenceIn hindsight it's probably no surprise the first half was boring (as far as I could tell, I was listening on the radio). Didn't Our Man Carrigan drop the ball in the first couple of minutes? My guess is that they all felt their ballsacks shrivelling and decided not to take ANY risks with the ball, just boring high-percentage football. The question is whether it helped us, by way of creating superior possession stats and wearing our opposition down (hence the flurry at the end), or whether it was decided that we needed more ball movement to score points and we abandoned No Risk Football at the end. Any opinions of whether the style of play changed before the points, or whether it was just a case of eventually wearing them down?
There's nothing wrong with playing the percentages so long as you are doing it to a purpose. With the bulldogs slow play you would be confident with a rushing defence might draw a mistake or two deep in their half.In hindsight it's probably no surprise the first half was boring (as far as I could tell, I was listening on the radio). Didn't Our Man Carrigan drop the ball in the first couple of minutes? My guess is that they all felt their ballsacks shrivelling and decided not to take ANY risks with the ball, just boring high-percentage football. The question is whether it helped us, by way of creating superior possession stats and wearing our opposition down (hence the flurry at the end), or whether it was decided that we needed more ball movement to score points and we abandoned No Risk Football at the end. Any opinions of whether the style of play changed before the points, or whether it was just a case of eventually wearing them down?
Stargate?
TitanicStargate?