I don’t care about James, Boyd, Turpin, Kennedy or anyone else.
Like I said, when people were excusing Boyd for contributing shit numbers because he was a good communicator or a good leader (which I still doubt, as the proof really is in the pudding), why weren’t you criticising him like you are James? Indeed, you, unlike almost every other person who saw Boyd’s final few seasons, thought his contributions were good, to the point you declared he was one of our best. The bloke was a passenger, a meme, yet somehow you thought he was good. You defended Boyd for the same things you’re criticising James for now.
There’s your hypocrisy.
But if you still don’t understand how you’re being a hypocrite, to use a Huge-ism: like Isaako, Boyd and every other plodder (like James is) you’ve defended, Walters keeps selecting James (like Barrett and Stuart before him and like Holbrook just did with Isaako - remember the old thread you reignited on Tuesday because Isaako was selected by Holbrook…), so he obviously sees something in him.