I am just curious, there has been lots of love for Hunt over the past few years, and again looking at just about everyone team, Hunt is at 7. I'm failing to see it and maybe I'm missing something. I've seen him start at 7 numerous times, not once have I seen him offer anything more than what we have now, let alone demand inclusion. Maybe it's just a case of ANYONE else rather than what we have. I look at other young halves, Reynolds, Reynolds, Miller, Cherry-Evans (I think about the same age) and Johnson, all have spark, speed or guile. Does anyone thing that if he was at 7 we would have won? I think many have been too harsh on Prince, first of all he is targeted in defense every game because he is new to our defensive structure, and any coach worth his salt would always send their bigger players towards the smaller ones, regardless who was there. IMO, it wouldn't matter who our halves were, if we continue to play so shallow in attack we will give no room to even the best of them. How many times did our halves get tackled with the ball because there was no one behind to pass it to?