V
Viti
NRL Player
- Feb 2, 2011
- 1,540
- 1,278
This is a fallacy.
Yeah, not really.
This is a fallacy.
We should be 4 and 4 basically. If Isaako doesn't drop the ball over the line we beat the Dragons and if our team knew how to set up for a field goal when you have a 6 tackle set starting from the half way line, we beat the Tigers.I agree we have lost experience, but even taking that into consideration we still aren't a side who should be 2 from 6. We still have plenty of experience here as well tbf.
Perhaps that experience might have got us over the line in a couple of those games that we lost by a couple of point's ?I agree we have lost experience, but even taking that into consideration we still aren't a side who should be 2 from 6. We still have plenty of experience here as well tbf.
Perhaps that experience might have got us over the line in a couple of those games that we lost by a couple of point's ?
We'd be sitting a lot better on the ladder now if a couple of better decisions were made in those games.
This is a fallacy.
How is it? We went from the grand final to 2nd week of the finals to destroyed in the first round of the finals. Without even looking at the performances and other factors (something that you routinely also do not do) that is clearly going backwards.
ok, so thinking on this a bit more, what we are seeing is definitely the transition from the 'Bennett' style ad lib, individual brilliance, low structure type gameplan that we have known since 1988 to the 'Bellamy/Maguire' highly structure and technical style of play.
This is a massive change of structure for the club and the players, the short answer is......................this is going to take time for the roster and players to evolve and adapt too, in fact if Souths are an indicator it could take up to five seasons to really produce results, we are moving away from the only style of football that we've ever known.
Souths (and Wayne) are now seeing the benefits of what Maguire started and what Seibs contributed to, Wayne has done very little at Souths, they are still playing to the structures they've built upon since Maguire.
Strap yourselves in boys, this is going to be rough year, we are transitioning everything, our recruitment, roster and style of play.
We are starting from scratch with a fresh young squad in the hope we can mold them into a team from which we can reap the benefits in 3 to 5 years.
I agree we have lost experience, but even taking that into consideration we still aren't a side who should be 2 from 6. We still have plenty of experience here as well tbf.
What guarantees do we have that success will actually come in the future?This is exactly right.
Personally I am happy to wait for success knowing that it will be actual sustainable improvement. Added bonus is that this next year or so will suit out the real fans of the team from the fans of winning, which is exciting.
The thing is, this squad scraped into the 8 last season and people will deem the season to be a success because thats the so called minimum for this club. What it doesn’t show is that the attitude has been terrible for a long time and was trending downwards. For me it all finally self destructed when the dragons flogged us in the finals last year. The squad hasn’t changed much at all and those mental scars are now on full show. If Bennett was here it’d be the same results. Some of these players are cooked and seibold really walked into a shit show at the worst possible time.
To compare with Bellamy in his formative years with arguably a lesser squad than ours, they finished 5th in his first year (2003), 6th in his 2nd and 3rd. So it didn't take him too long to put his stamp on the squad.ok, so thinking on this a bit more, what we are seeing is definitely the transition from the 'Bennett' style ad lib, individual brilliance, low structure type gameplan that we have known since 1988 to the 'Bellamy/Maguire' highly structure and technical style of play.
This is a massive change of structure for the club and the players, the short answer is......................this is going to take time for the roster and players to evolve and adapt too, in fact if Souths are an indicator it could take up to five seasons to really produce results, we are moving away from the only style of football that we've ever known.
Souths (and Wayne) are now seeing the benefits of what Maguire started and what Seibs contributed to, Wayne has done very little at Souths, they are still playing to the structures they've built upon since Maguire.
Strap yourselves in boys, this is going to be rough year, we are transitioning everything, our recruitment, roster and style of play.
We are starting from scratch with a fresh young squad in the hope we can mold them into a team from which we can reap the benefits in 3 to 5 years.
To compare with Bellamy in his formative years with arguably a lesser squad than ours, they finished 5th in his first year (2003), 6th in his 2nd and 3rd. So it didn't take him too long to put his stamp on the squad.
Seibold has had 6 months with the squad already, I'm sick of seeing the same rhetoric about how long it's going to take to undo old methods. How long is enough to implement his methods? 12 months? 24 months? it smacks of 5 year bullshit and an acceptance of mediocrity. Have we become the new Parra?
What guarantees do we have that success will actually come in the future?