Stix
NRL Player
- Mar 28, 2014
- 1,640
- 1,482
Players used to wack on the headgear for a couple of games after a decent knock to the scone. If he passes all the tests and feels good stick a helmet on him and game on.
The brain surgeon has his say, fwiw.
He has a point, though.
If the NRL are serious about player welfare then anyone that gets knocked out in a game should sit out a week whether they like it or not.
I think Willie Carne or Shaun Valentine would be even better ambassadors.He's actually the perfect ambassador for what too many head-knocks can do to you.
You can't really put a blanket rule in place it should be up to the team's doctor to decide if they play or not. As they are the ones that take on the responsibilities.He has a point, though.
If the NRL are serious about player welfare then anyone that gets knocked out in a game should sit out a week whether they like it or not.
Rubbish. Balls on the ground, entitled to pick it up and run. Should have been play on and a Penrith try.
And I suppose Melbourne should have played on and scored after they crippled Alex McKinnon?
Seriously, there is a player lying prone, clearly seriously injured, and you think it's play on?
Play is stopped every day of the week in that situation, and everyone knows it - it's so obvious that even the bloody Panthers themselves aren't saying it's wrong!
Play is ALWAYS stopped in cases of severe injury, and anyone who hasn't seen that happening hasn't watched much rugby league
Apples and oranges. Oates ran into his own player, dropped the ball and Penrith were in the clear. McKinnon was spear tackled onto his head so not even close.
Apples and oranges. Oates ran into his own player, dropped the ball and Penrith were in the clear. McKinnon was spear tackled onto his head so not even close.
Not even close?
Both players injured in an incident, and lying prone on the turf
In terms of player welfare they are identical
I'd say what he's getting at is the blowing of the whistle.......Oates was friendly fire, McKinnon's was from an illegal tackle. You're right however, in terms of player welfare, they're identical.
To be fair, the tackle on McKinnon wasn't actually illegal at the time.
I don't think it even is now. It's just held is called when a players legs are lifted now.
Watching NRL 360 and they just showed the interview of Wayne slamming the critics for giving Oates the green light to play.
Kent's response? He was being a big bully, trying to dictate what the media writes up because he doesn't like the narrative that's going on around the club..
Did Wayne take a big runny turd in his weetbix or something?