T
tkday
Banned User
- Mar 10, 2010
- 1,118
- 65
Yes, yes and yes. I'm soooo hungry for a premiership for the Bronocs again, I just can't see it happening for a long time which is depressing ain't it?
I honestly think WB had to go, his time was up. He was stale at the Broncos and our performances were reflecting that. What we didn't handle was his replacement and Coxy is right with Lockyer. That was the biggest mistake, to not replace him. We were right up in 2011 before Locky had his cheeckbone fracture (that was 2011 right?). He made up for what our coach lacked. Problem is, how do you replace someone like him? All I know is that the Broncos have shown how NOT to plan for when someone like Locky leaves a club. At this stage though, WB would still be a hell of a lot better than Griffin, but I still don't want him back.
he proper fucked st george over though, so there is merit to that guys thinking. keeping oldies and then taking half of the good players with him when he left.
he proper fucked st george over though, so there is merit to that guys thinking. keeping oldies and then taking half of the good players with him when he left.
his team missed the finals last year, despite making them the year before he started there.How's this for irony, Wayne Bennett has the oldest team, is above us on the ladder, scored 48 points more than the Broncos and conceded 28 points less than the Broncos ! For a coach from a bygone era he seems to have learned about the ' new ' style of football played these days. When you consider he has not had a huge budget to work with it seems he's done pretty well. It appears more modern coaches in the league are behind him. You'd almost conclude from the evidence that Wayne Bennett is still relevant and capable. Despite this you could still say he was crAP.
it does matter because youre making out that its a fact that he knew. he was found by the investigators to have had no knowledge. the fact that you still not only believe that he did, but state that he did as if its a fact, shows your bias.
youre forgetting that they were independent investigators, not internal NRL ones. the NRL have no say in the findings. if the investigators found any evidence of it, regardless of how it would affect the game, they wouldve said so. they said the exact opposite, that there was no evidence whatsoever to suggest that Bellamy or any of the players had any knowledge.If the investigators came out & said he knew, it would have been a worst disaster for our game.
oh right, forgot that the second youre not in the current team youre not a rep player. guess darren lockyer isnt a rep player. unlucky darren.AP...I just scanned Bennys team for the weekend and I found one, just one current rep player ! That would be Darius Boyd. I'm unsure about your claim that Newcastle has the most rep players ! How do you reach such a conclusion ? Rejects like Mason perhaps ? Old fellas like Gower ( 35 ! ) Uate is a former rep along with Snowden and I guess you'd include Buderus and Costigan but surely it's a stretch to say Newcastle have the most reps !