Huge
International Rep
Contributor
- Mar 7, 2008
- 13,618
- 10,547
Two votes away from winning the Dally M in 2010 indicates he was in superb form and was the form fullback in the NRL that year. Not only was he two votes shy of the overall Dally M he was the fullback of the year.As for Slater competing with Cronk, rubbish. Slater may have played well and so may others but none were better in 2010 than Boyd. How you can make a case for Gordon and Dugan is outstandingly dull witted. They weren't even on the radar of the Dally M awards, total nonsense. If they were better than it would have been reflected but it wasn't. Trying to invent an argument for an indefensible position.There was no grudge in my acknowledgement. Boyd was one of the best fullbacks in 2010, period.
Let's not restart the Dally M discussion, as while it certainly rewards players for their performance throughout a season, it also very often highlights a player as the clear best at his club, while "hiding" better players at clubs where they share the highlight. Slater for example had to compete with Cameron Smith and Cronk for his Dally M tally.
Was Boyd the best that season?
I don't think so, as Slater was superb in a superb team, Gordon had an excellent year at the Panthers and that was by far Dugan's best season too imo.
However, since then, Boyd has not come close to replicating that season, and has gradually been worse, and even if his 2013 was better than 2012, it still wasn't that much to write about, and was still in the bottom 8 fullbacks in the comp.
What you call bias, I call an opinion based on how I view Rugby League, and in particular the Fullback position. It's nothing personal against Boyd, much less against Bennett.
But if you keep insisting it is, could it be because of your bias that anything related to Bennett is immaculate...?
I have no clue what your last line means ! 'anything related to Bennett is immaculate' ? Perfectly clean ? Neat ? Tidy ?