Battler
State of Origin Rep
- Dec 4, 2013
- 7,130
- 6,983
6. Hunt, 7. Thurston, 14. DCE. I'd prefer a forward off the bench over a utility, but DCE has shown more in Origin (off the bench, he's been garbage in every game he's started) than Morgan.
Maybe the selectors should use the poll on the Courier Mail website to pick Cronks replacement :tongue:
results are:
Ben Hunt ... 41.67% (350 votes)
Michael Morgan (JT to half) ... 35.71 % (300 votes)
DCE ... 22.62% (190 votes)
Being realistic, it will be a straight swap. DCE for Cronk and the rest of the team will remain unchanged.
People have been acting like babies about the whole "backflip" drama and they need to sort their shit out. It's not that big of a deal for ***** sake and it has led to the NRL reforming the rule anyway. Any Queenslander who wants to boo DCE is an idiot.
Lets get on with it.
I don't give a shit whether he backfliped on the Titans.
But Hunt has been out performing DCE for the last year and a half. That is why he should get the spot
I don't give a shit whether he backfliped on the Titans.
But Hunt has been out performing DCE for the last year and a half. That is why he should get the spot
Agree with Nashy, we all love Hunt, but realistically he only has a good kicking game once a month, the rest of the time it's well below average. At least with DCE you know you're going to get a very good kicking game.
I'd still personally go with the club combination of Morgan & Thurston, they work well together, I'm a little worried about Hunt/Thurston or Thurston/DCE in terms of cohesion in a short period of time.
Now all that being said, I think it's better for the team if DCE is 7 and Hunt is 14. Hunt can be a very good impact player and DCE is definitely good enough for the 7 but as shown previously doesn't offer a whole lot off the bench.