OFFICIAL 2023 TEAM UPDATE: SECOND BEST

Watch this space for latest injuries, suspensions and training updates.

GRAND FINAL



SUSPENDED

INJURED

Willison: ankle, season over.



LATEST JUDICIARY
 
Screenshot 20230627 200004 Twitter


Peak NRL. 🤡🤡🤡
 
I think he said it was because he had been coming up all game to him and he was warned. That's why he marched them 10. Absolutely zero evidence from the referee.
So is being marched 10 enough of a penalty for Walsh being an annoying dickhead all game?
 
Bet it comes back.

We don't have any evidence to prove you guilty, but we find you guilty.
Insufficient evidence to overturn the onfield decision. The challenge is unsuccessful...successful...unsuccessful...Broncos lose their challenge.

"But what was the call?"
"I told you, you'd lose the challenge"
"What was the call?"
"You had 10 seconds"
"I asked to challenge"
"Scrum is here"
 
So how long?

3 weeks like Brandon? Or do they make a bigger example and give him over a month?
 
So how long?

3 weeks like Brandon? Or do they make a bigger example and give him over a month?
Even if they believe it was to the ref surely you can’t get more for swearing than questioning his integrity? I’m saying that I expect him to be out for the season.
 
I still want to know if Verrils, who was "mic'd up" was close
 
So how long?

3 weeks like Brandon? Or do they make a bigger example and give him over a month?

they'll probably add a few weeks to that 3 for making the NRL look like fools.

the NRL remind me of Chief Wiggum from this clip

 
The ref himself said he was unsure who it was directed at.

So if you are then suspending for use of the word that will have been said 300 times in the course of the hearing, that's hillarious.

If Fox then used the same tech (they won't) to highlight what is said during every game, you'd be having players out for swearing every week..

Still think he'll be suspended for 2+ because the NRL won't want to lose this one.
 
So is being marched 10 enough of a penalty for Walsh being an annoying dickhead all game?
Isn't the official meant to determine that?? Isn't that his job??

If he was chirping at him outside of questioning decisions then he can penalise him for dissent... if he thinks he directed a verbal at him he can bin him.

Why did the ref decide that the most appropriate action was marching him 10m and telling Reynolds that if he does it again he's off... after telling him at half time that he's had enough of him questioning every decision.

If he had been giving him verbals all game and abusing him then I'm pretty sure he's going with something a bit harsher than marching him 10m
 

Active Now

  • Mr Fourex
  • Harry Sack
  • GCBRONCO
  • mrslong
  • JoeldTrafford
  • Robboi_321
  • Old Mate
  • Socnorb
  • Manofoneway
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.