The True King
NRL Player
- Apr 6, 2018
- 1,695
- 1,660
Not a valid opinion because he hasn't taken as many test wickets.Leach is better than Lyon.
Not a valid opinion because he hasn't taken as many test wickets.Leach is better than Lyon.
No it’s not valid because Lyon has taken 14 wickets and Leach has 4Not a valid opinion because he hasn't taken as many test wickets.
Lyon has played every test this series. I'm not sure that's a fair comparison.No it’s not valid because Lyon has taken 14 wickets and Leach has 4
Yes it is valid. All opinions valid!Not a valid opinion because he hasn't taken as many test wickets.
It is when the difference is 10 wickets and currently Nathan has bowled in 6 innings versus Leach’s 5.Lyon has played every test this series. I'm not sure that's a fair comparison.
Boland has 5 more wickets than Broad in 2 less innings.It is when the difference is 10 wickets and currently Nathan has bowled in 6 innings versus Leach’s 5.
Couldn't more with myself on that oneLyon sucks he really, really sucks!
=Greatly Overrated (of) All Time!
Boland!Boland has 5 more wickets than Broad in 2 less innings.
Who do you think is the better test bowler?
Scott has bowled levels better than Stuart this test series. You’ve been sweating on a shit Lyon innings now for 4 tests to save yourself from a clearly embarrassing statement a month back. Yet in that shit innings he still snagged half the amount of wickets Leach has for the series and same amount he had at the start of today. We get it you fucken hate Lyon so do us a favour and shut the **** up with your clear biases and whinging without being able to suggest someone who can realistically do better for **** sakes. Like seriously your kidding yourself if you reckon someone could. You can suggest that an innings wasn’t good enough but you have been bagging him at an excessive and inappropriate rate for the way he has been bowling this series, which is far better than your behaviour suggests.Boland has 5 more wickets than Broad in 2 less innings.
Who do you think is the better test bowler?
Solid rant Fitzy but it didn't answer the questionScott has bowled levels better than Stuart this test series. You’ve been sweating on a shit Lyon innings now for 4 tests to save yourself from a clearly embarrassing statement a month back. Yet in that shit innings he still snagged half the amount of wickets Leach has for the series and same amount he had at the start of today. We get it you fucken hate Lyon so do us a favour and shut the **** up with your clear biases and whinging without being able to suggest someone who can realistically do better for **** sakes. Like seriously your kidding yourself if you reckon someone could. You can suggest that an innings wasn’t good enough but you have been bagging him at an excessive and inappropriate rate for the way he has been bowling this series, which is far better than your behaviour suggests.
Ok let’s use his career of over 400 wicketSolid rant Fitzy but it didn't answer the question
Thank you for proving my point that we should not use one series to judge a player.
Genuine question, do you think Cook was a better batsman than Michael Hussey?Ok let’s use his career of over 400 wicket
Tell me how this is relevant when Leach has the exact same average as Lyon and Lyon has played 103 tests. With significantly more wickets. The same bowling average over time doesn’t give the same amount of wickets it is in reference to runs every wicket. Lyon takes wickets like every spinner, they are atttacking weapons not economical and stopping runs if he picks up wickets their is no issue with a 30 average. Go ask any expert, your and every other persons amateur opinion is not correct. You definitely cannot compare bowling averages the same way with batting averages in the context of time.Genuine question, do you think Cook was a better batsman than Michael Hussey?
He did score 12,000+ test runs.. almost double the amount that Hussey did.
So you think Leach wont improve that average with experience?Tell me how this is relevant when Leach has the exact same average as Lyon and Lyon has played 103 tests. With significantly more wickets. The same bowling average over time doesn’t give the same amount of wickets it is in reference to runs every wicket. Lyon takes wickets like every spinner, they are atttacking weapons not economical and stopping runs if he picks up wickets their is no issue with a 30 average. Go ask any expert, your and every other persons amateur opinion is not correct. You definitely cannot compare bowling averages the same way with batting averages in the context of time.
That’s true but leach can barely hold off crane and bess at his age of 30 there isn’t much more test cricket for him.So you think Leach wont improve that average with experience?
Interestingly that's exactly what Lyon did.