- Oct 28, 2013
- 12,318
- 13,100
OFFICIAL Ashley Taylor to Titans
- Thread starter Big Pete
- Start date
- Mar 13, 2008
- 6,522
- 2,807
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
You're right -- it will destabilise them. But the more game time they get together, the more disruptive it will be if Milford does get moved. Which is why, despite Taylor's contract running til next year, I think it's kind of now or never. I get that every team loses young talent, but to me there's a difference between losing young talent and losing very talented young halves.
As for playing against men, there's really no way of knowing. For whatever reason, he's not playing ISC this year. Frankly I don't understand why.
You're right -- it will destabilise them. But the more game time they get together, the more disruptive it will be if Milford does get moved. Which is why, despite Taylor's contract running til next year, I think it's kind of now or never. I get that every team loses young talent, but to me there's a difference between losing young talent and losing very talented young halves.
As for playing against men, there's really no way of knowing. For whatever reason, he's not playing ISC this year. Frankly I don't understand why.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 9,586
- 8,889
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
The other thing for mine is that when you play at a "lower standard", that is where your mind set and performance lies.
You don't get to grow until you are given the chance to prove yourself at a higher level, when you are given the challenge. You rise to the occasion, given a bit of time to adjust of course, and you either risr to the occasion or you don't, but at least you get the chance.
Like I still maintain, our team is what it is ONLY because Bennett has Boyd locked in as FB, which is not a bad thing 'cos Boyd is competent enough to be very good in that role. However, there are consequences, and we are seeing them now. A lot are very good - like we are top of the table without Boyd or Kahu (for the most).
However, our attack is under-done and that will bite us on the bum unless Hunt and Milford and Macca step up. What is not a good consequence is that Taylor will be playing at lower standards and being locked into that for some years to come.
As for destabilising the team by shuffling around now, I agree. It is too late this season. However, things might change if, perish the thought, something happens to Milford or Hunt. But even then, I can't see Taylor getting a run in the halves. We have to re-stabilise in other ways I suspect.
The other thing for mine is that when you play at a "lower standard", that is where your mind set and performance lies.
You don't get to grow until you are given the chance to prove yourself at a higher level, when you are given the challenge. You rise to the occasion, given a bit of time to adjust of course, and you either risr to the occasion or you don't, but at least you get the chance.
Like I still maintain, our team is what it is ONLY because Bennett has Boyd locked in as FB, which is not a bad thing 'cos Boyd is competent enough to be very good in that role. However, there are consequences, and we are seeing them now. A lot are very good - like we are top of the table without Boyd or Kahu (for the most).
However, our attack is under-done and that will bite us on the bum unless Hunt and Milford and Macca step up. What is not a good consequence is that Taylor will be playing at lower standards and being locked into that for some years to come.
As for destabilising the team by shuffling around now, I agree. It is too late this season. However, things might change if, perish the thought, something happens to Milford or Hunt. But even then, I can't see Taylor getting a run in the halves. We have to re-stabilise in other ways I suspect.
- Apr 26, 2008
- 34,580
- 35,552
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
I'll ignore your Boyd to Wallace comparison. You're clearly blinded by your dislike of him for me to take your opinion seriously. Comparing Boyd to Wallace is ridiculous, so I won't even bother with that argument.
As for these juniors not being talked up, who are you kidding? I've been following league circles for a while now obviously, and there's always a few juniors from every club that are talked up to be amazing talents, the players I mentioned are definitely part of them.
Hampton:
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/melbourne-storm-to-put-faith-in-rising-star-ben-hampton-to-replace-gareth-widdop-at-five-eighth/story-fni3gpfg-1226686534257 - This was TWO YEARS ago, he's still not a regular fixture, they event went out of their way to get Blake Green for this year and next - so the rising star who was talked up as 5/8 in 2014, probably won't get a shot as a regular 5/8 till 2017, if ever.
Another one - a year later http://www.dailymercury.com.au/news/young-star-sets-sights-on-coveted-storm-role/2138402/
Munster:
The list goes on and on. So don't blame me for being a bit cynical when people are advocating Taylor is a better long term prospect than Milford is it at 5/8, or that Boyd should be moved from a crucial position in the team (fullback), to accommodate a rookie 5/8. If that's true, and he's really that good, he'll undoubtedly get a chance to prove it before his contract is up with us, and if the coaching staff also believe it, they'll offer him another contract to stick around and start playing him from the bench even if their isn't a regular starting spot, just like Hunt had to do for a fair while before he got the regular 7 jersey.
I don't "know" that isn't the case, but clearly the coaching staff think that isn't the case right now, hence he's not first choice half, but was also signed on big money for a junior, so they clearly rate him but don't think he's ready, that's totally fair in my view!
I'll ignore your Boyd to Wallace comparison. You're clearly blinded by your dislike of him for me to take your opinion seriously. Comparing Boyd to Wallace is ridiculous, so I won't even bother with that argument.
As for these juniors not being talked up, who are you kidding? I've been following league circles for a while now obviously, and there's always a few juniors from every club that are talked up to be amazing talents, the players I mentioned are definitely part of them.
Hampton:
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/melbourne-storm-to-put-faith-in-rising-star-ben-hampton-to-replace-gareth-widdop-at-five-eighth/story-fni3gpfg-1226686534257 - This was TWO YEARS ago, he's still not a regular fixture, they event went out of their way to get Blake Green for this year and next - so the rising star who was talked up as 5/8 in 2014, probably won't get a shot as a regular 5/8 till 2017, if ever.
Another one - a year later http://www.dailymercury.com.au/news/young-star-sets-sights-on-coveted-storm-role/2138402/
So highly rated they signed a 28 year old half back from the super league on a two year contract.
Munster:
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/intrust-super-cup-cameron-munster-stars-as-easts-tigers-beat-souths-logan-magpies-52-0/story-fni3gpfg-1227292743004 Greg Inglis would be impressed? Bamboozled with a left foot step that would make Milford jealous? Storm prodigy? Is that what you consider not talking up beyond reasonable ISC form?
"Superstar" "Secret weapon" - all seem like big hyped up words to me.
The list goes on and on. So don't blame me for being a bit cynical when people are advocating Taylor is a better long term prospect than Milford is it at 5/8, or that Boyd should be moved from a crucial position in the team (fullback), to accommodate a rookie 5/8. If that's true, and he's really that good, he'll undoubtedly get a chance to prove it before his contract is up with us, and if the coaching staff also believe it, they'll offer him another contract to stick around and start playing him from the bench even if their isn't a regular starting spot, just like Hunt had to do for a fair while before he got the regular 7 jersey.
broncos4life
International Captain
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,478
- 27,136
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
Quite possibly because the coaching staff don't believe he's ready yet and want to handle his development properly without throwing him into the deep end.
Quite possibly because the coaching staff don't believe he's ready yet and want to handle his development properly without throwing him into the deep end.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 9,586
- 8,889
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
I am not talking Boyd down at all. I am just saying that we didn't need him, and that the only reason he is here is because Bennett wanted him here. In my view, he was not recruited on form but on reputation, much like Barba was on his '12 form.
He is a an absolutely top class winger and very competent FB who will make our team even better than it is (although IMO Kahu could do the same if not better given a little time).
Clearly, Bennett had made up his mind about the team he wanted and wants which is his prerogative. He has also said, I have posted, that we need to focus on not losing class like Taylor, so I am curious what he intends to do with Taylor, and I know it won't be this year.
I am not talking Boyd down at all. I am just saying that we didn't need him, and that the only reason he is here is because Bennett wanted him here. In my view, he was not recruited on form but on reputation, much like Barba was on his '12 form.
He is a an absolutely top class winger and very competent FB who will make our team even better than it is (although IMO Kahu could do the same if not better given a little time).
Clearly, Bennett had made up his mind about the team he wanted and wants which is his prerogative. He has also said, I have posted, that we need to focus on not losing class like Taylor, so I am curious what he intends to do with Taylor, and I know it won't be this year.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 9,586
- 8,889
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
You don't get to win gold by swimming on your belly in the shallows
You don't get to win gold by swimming on your belly in the shallows
- Mar 13, 2008
- 6,522
- 2,807
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
I disagree. I'm sure someone will give you a gold star!
I disagree. I'm sure someone will give you a gold star!
- Oct 17, 2013
- 12,840
- 14,848
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
You also don't get to win gold if there are swimmers who are better than you in the race.
You also don't get to win gold if there are swimmers who are better than you in the race.
broncos4life
International Captain
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,478
- 27,136
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
Well tell the coaching staff that, you clearly know better than them.
Well tell the coaching staff that, you clearly know better than them.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 9,586
- 8,889
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
Yes, true, but you don't get to find out until you are in the race. Obviously, the question is who makes, and when, that decision is made. So we wait...
Yes, true, but you don't get to find out until you are in the race. Obviously, the question is who makes, and when, that decision is made. So we wait...
- Oct 17, 2013
- 12,840
- 14,848
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
But you also have to qualify for that gold medal race.
But you also have to qualify for that gold medal race.
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,782
- 41,485
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
just because we are leading the comp at this stage, doesn't mean we shouldn't be looking improve our team... if we wait until we start losing (if that happens, and due to origin there is a good chance as usual), then by the time the new combinations gel, it may be too late.
we should always be looking to improve our team, IMO, not just be happy scrapping by.
just because we are leading the comp at this stage, doesn't mean we shouldn't be looking improve our team... if we wait until we start losing (if that happens, and due to origin there is a good chance as usual), then by the time the new combinations gel, it may be too late.
we should always be looking to improve our team, IMO, not just be happy scrapping by.
- Oct 17, 2013
- 12,840
- 14,848
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
Maybe the people who select the team don't see massive defensive lapses as something that will improve the Broncos.
Maybe the people who select the team don't see massive defensive lapses as something that will improve the Broncos.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 9,586
- 8,889
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
The catch-22 here is when do you know? Making or not, great defensive decisions and tackles in "juniors' is one thing, but the acid test is against men, not boys so to speak.
At some point in time, that acid test will have to come. My point in part, is that I hope it isn't left until too late.
The catch-22 here is when do you know? Making or not, great defensive decisions and tackles in "juniors' is one thing, but the acid test is against men, not boys so to speak.
At some point in time, that acid test will have to come. My point in part, is that I hope it isn't left until too late.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 9,586
- 8,889
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
B4L, that is really uncalled for. I am expressing my opinion, on a forum designed for that. We all have our views and this place gives you the freedom to do that, however outrageous they seem to others.
B4L, that is really uncalled for. I am expressing my opinion, on a forum designed for that. We all have our views and this place gives you the freedom to do that, however outrageous they seem to others.
broncos4life
International Captain
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,478
- 27,136
Re: Should Ashley Taylor Be Promoted
No one is suggesting we are or should be happy scrapping by, but throwing Taylor in the deep end has the ability to really destabilise the team, and his development.
This team needs time to continue gelling its combinations, not moving pieces to accomodate a talented junior with time on his side and not a second playing in anything higher than the u20s
No one is suggesting we are or should be happy scrapping by, but throwing Taylor in the deep end has the ability to really destabilise the team, and his development.
This team needs time to continue gelling its combinations, not moving pieces to accomodate a talented junior with time on his side and not a second playing in anything higher than the u20s
