Bennett explains why he axed Vidot

Daniel Vidot set for NRL recall at prop for Brisbane Broncos as Wayne Bennett rings changes

DANIEL Vidot has opened up on the pain of being dropped by Wayne Bennett but the master coach could recall him this week after watching his impressive front-row debut for Ipswich.

Bennett will make changes for Round 2 after their forward pack was dominated by South Sydney with Test veteran and former captain Sam Thaiday expected to be relegated to the bench for Matt Gillett.

Vidot is battling Mitch Garbutt to replace the suspended James Gavet for Brisbane’s clash with Cronulla and Ben Barba this Friday.

Melbourne Storm recruit Garbutt was solid for Souths Logan on Sunday, scoring a barnstorming try in the second half to state his case for the NRL team.

However, Newcastle recruit Joe Boyce outshone him in the Magpies backrow.

20-year-old prodigy Corey Oates was also excellent for the Central Capras in his first game of the year.

Round 1 Broncos bolter Aaron Whitchurch is on the chopping block after making two errors in his three runs against South Sydney with Kodi Nikorima in the frame to replace him.

Bennett was close to playing Nikorima in Round 1 but considering their team lacked forward punch and Andrew McCullough is an 80-minute hooker, Bennett could again opt for a four forward bench.

Vidot deserves to be recalled based on his performance for Ipswich and will bring the hit-up metres Brisbane wished they had last week against South Sydney.

The Rabbitohs made almost 500 more metres than the Broncos, exposing Brisbane’s lack of grunt.

Vidot finished last season averaging 165m, the most of any back in the competition.

He told The Courier-Mail he is happy to become a prop if it means wearing the Broncos jersey again.

“I would have loved to be there for Corey Parker’s 300th game because it was a big occasion and it hurt to be on the sideline for that,” he said.

“It definitely hurt me. I have been a Broncos fan since I was a youngster and I always will be so now I have to keep my head down and do my best and hopefully something happens in the next couple of weeks.

“I will leave that for Wayne to decide.

“It was a different experience in the middle but I had fun in there and I enjoyed it.

“I am a go with the flow kind of guy and I don’t mind where I play. If the team wants me there I’ll give my best.

“You are doing the up and back a lot more in the middle which was beneficial for me.

“I think I lost a couple of kilos just playing in the middle out there.”

Source: http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport...tt-rings-changes/story-fniabm4i-1227254095690
 
Last edited:
I don't consider him a prop. Or a forward at all. The runs that he makes are normally near the sidelines, and it's normally the smaller guys tackling him which is why he can tank it up so far. In the middle he'll be hitting defenders the same or much bigger than him, and be well outnumbered. I have my doubts.
 
is that CM article just doing 2 + 2? if 1910's info about bennett laughing at playing vidot at prop...

anyone know how vidot went on the weekend?
 
I don't believe this article as far as dan at prop goes but I'd like to see him and Oates both in the team somewhere. On the wing or otherwise.
 
id be very surprised if maranta was dropped. he did nothing wrong on thursday.

only one i can see making way is reed. but i dont think he'd be dropped either, at least as yet.
 
I think Oates is a priority and dropping Thaiday would be a warm and fuzzy result for me...I have called for him to be benched or sent back to ISC for two years but I think he has been under performing for even longer. Looking forward to having Garbutt in the team soon. Thought Maranta was reasonably good the other night.
 

Unread

Active Now

  • Harry Sack
  • Dash
  • Sproj
  • BroncosAlways
  • Johnny92
  • Aldo
  • Totally Unr3al
  • IceWorks
  • kman
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.