Broncos Player Movement and Rumours 2016

[austin71]

If Hunt is going...

6. Lolohea
7.Milf

Just throwing it out there..No organization going on there though. No game management at all!

 

[Sirlee oldman]

Just read about Foran if he does end up going to Warriors Lolohea will be leaving because he doesn't want to be known as a utility player.

But if we did pick him up he said he wants to be 'Five eight' but we already have Milford so where would we put him any suggestions?

Redcliffe.

 

[pagey]

If Hunt is going...

6. Lolohea
7.Milf

Just throwing it out there..No organization going on there though. No game management at all!

Surely that couldn't happen

 

[MrMoore]

Milford @ 7 is one of the stupidest things I have heard on this forum.

 

[_wwong]

Just read about Foran if he does end up going to Warriors Lolohea will be leaving because he doesn't want to be known as a utility player.

But if we did pick him up he said he wants to be 'Five eight' but we already have Milford so where would we put him any suggestions?

Put him on his arse when he plays against us.

 

[Kyall]

If we let go of hunt and get lolohea we will be in the same terrible situation as bulldogs 2 5/8's and our attack would go to shit because of no direction

 

[Alec]

Sharks won the comp with 2 five-eights, but they had a gun hooker.

 

[Kyall]

Chad has always been a half and Maloney is a running 5/8

 

[1910]

Definitely isn't our junior but we have put a lot more work into him than we have Roberts.

What do you mean?

 

[Alec]

Chad has always been a half and Maloney is a running 5/8

I dunno what he's always been, but he's a 5/8th now.

 

[Mitchell_Broncos]

This isn't Broncos related but while you guys are talking about sharks who is replacing Ennis for next season do you know?

 

[Danoz Direct]

This isn't Broncos related but while you guys are talking about sharks who is replacing Ennis for next season do you know?

Different thread for that mate.

 

[Super Freak]

You can't just sign someone because we're the broncos. I don't think Bromwich is someone we need either would be huge money again and he's more of a workhorse type prop.

I think we need a power prop that will take the hard hit up and take it strong like Sam Burgess does for bunnies and I don't know when one of them will come on the market

I disagree.

Bromwich would be perfect for us.

He is a very good prop, a very strong prop. He would provide us with much needed experience and leadership up the front.

He doesn't send blokes flying on impact, but he is a strong runner of the ball and he is very hard to bring down. He commits defenders, he drags them and that tires the defence quicker. It would allow our impact props to have more impact.

I think it's one of the reasons why Taumalolo is so damaging, because Scott and Tamou do the hard work and lay the platform and Taumalolo comes on and takes advantage of that.

If Bromwich ever becomes a realistic option, which I highly doubt he would, we should definitely bring out the cheque book to sign him. He is worth every cent.

We just need a prop that will do the job a prop is supposed to do and Bromwich does it better than anyone else.

 

[Kyall]

Cherrington junior from tigers most probably and they have a good young junior as well can't remember his name

 

[Danoz Direct]

What do you mean?

That we would have developed Ese'ese more than we have Roberts.

 

[Smokin' Joe]

That we would have developed Ese'ese more than we have Roberts.

how?

 

[Danoz Direct]

how?

I'm guessing since you guys keep asking me this that we haven't done much of Ese'ese's development and it has mostly been done by Souths Logan and before that the Bulldogs.

Just thought since Ese'ese had only played one first grade game when he came here and now he has played several more that we would have had more of an impact on him than we have had on Roberts considering he was already a first grader.

 

[1910]

That we would have developed Ese'ese more than we have Roberts.

Yes how has more work been put in to Herman than Roberts?