broncos4life
International Captain
Forum Staff
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,387
- 27,048
Fair enough, I just felt he went beyond questionning them as just allegations though, he seemed to imply (to me anyway) that it was a mixture of medications the doctor gave him and the issues from his wife in the marriage breakdown. I just felt he tried to defend Burgess a bit too far but more than happy for you to see it differently.
And to be fair, I just don't like Hooper, so my judgment is likely biased.
I also do not like Hooper but also felt he was more defending Burgess rather than just remaining impartial. Bringing up a messy divorce and going to court for custody of the kids to suggest that this may be all to do with that is not remaining impartial.