I wonder if we would have been more accommodating had the warriors not gone after lodge, turpin etc. so hard, and increased the amount we had to pay to retain them.
I completely agree with all of this... but there's one very important point that's being missed here...I dont see the PR storm. He is a Broncos player, we loan him to the Warriors and if we get an injury crisis we get him back as he is our player. Its been happening in soccer for decades with no issues whatsoever. Warriors would be going into it knowing they could lose a player they take on loan.
I think your other point has merit as well. Makes sense to give them a bit of leeway in the cap. They may need a combination of a loan player and an exemption to sign a player as well.
TImm isn't anything to do with the Broncos. His train and trial game deal is done. Redcliffe let him go train with the Warriors.I completely agree with all of this... but there's one very important point that's being missed here...
Niu is off contract at the end of the year..... smart thinking by the warriors I think...
The club offered timms from what i heard. Moral obligation done. I get the situation sucked for the PLAYERS, but it was the club we were helping not the current warrior players. If anything it'd increase competition for spots, they wouldn't have been stoked about it...