Cult
International Rep
Contributor
- Oct 17, 2013
- 12,817
- 14,778
Hunt at hooker is a long way better than any other option that would come to us at the moment
Hunt at hooker is a long way better than any other option that would come to us at the moment
Agree with previous sentiments. He can't expect to have it both ways. He had the choice to try and find another contract, be it with the knights or whoever but wasn't able to so he activated his clause with us. Shouldn't then be able to take backsies because a better offer has come along.
I reckon he would have if it weren’t for the knee reconstructionAgree with previous sentiments. He can't expect to have it both ways. He had the choice to try and find another contract, be it with the knights or whoever but wasn't able to so he activated his clause with us. Shouldn't then be able to take backsies because a better offer has come along.
Sounds like he doesn't want to be in Brisbane so they should just let him walk and make St george pay his owing salary if they want him that badly.
But we’ve already paid some of this years salary and we need the depth. Simply covering his remaining contract still isn’t a good enough deal for us. Player swap or nothing. Give as Dufty/Lomax/Ravalara/Hunt/McInnis for a year or too bad.Agree with previous sentiments. He can't expect to have it both ways. He had the choice to try and find another contract, be it with the knights or whoever but wasn't able to so he activated his clause with us. Shouldn't then be able to take backsies because a better offer has come along.
Sounds like he doesn't want to be in Brisbane so they should just let him walk and make St george pay his owing salary if they want him that badly.
Wishful thinking that they'd give up any of those guys for him particularly Lomax, ravalawa or hunt (they're trying to move dufty on it seems but doubt they'd let us have him). We would likely get one of their no name players as paymentBut we’ve already paid some of this years salary and we need the depth. Simply covering his remaining contract still isn’t a good enough deal for us. Player swap or nothing. Give as Dufty/Lomax/Ravalara/Hunt/McInnis for a year or too bad.
I don’t think it’s wishful thinking. It is what it is, I am happy to keep Macca, I wouldn’t accept anything less. Macca is useful and leaves at the end of the year anyway. We have all the negotiating power.Wishful thinking that they'd give up any of those guys for him particularly Lomax, ravalawa or hunt (they're trying to move dufty on it seems but doubt they'd let us have him). We would likely get one of their no name players as payment
This.But we’ve already paid some of this years salary and we need the depth. Simply covering his remaining contract still isn’t a good enough deal for us. Player swap or nothing. Give as Dufty/Lomax/Ravalara/Hunt/McInnis for a year or too bad.
Dufty would be an interesting trade. I rate him and think he has the potential to go up a level but even as he was last year, he'd immediately be the best fullback in our team. Player swap for a year, see how he performs in our colours.Wishful thinking that they'd give up any of those guys for him particularly Lomax, ravalawa or hunt (they're trying to move dufty on it seems but doubt they'd let us have him). We would likely get one of their no name players as payment
He only has this season left at the dragons. Better than languishing behind Lomax, he can come here for a year and earn his next contract and if he learns how to tackle maybe we think about offering an extension.Dufty would be an interesting trade. I rate him and think he has the potential to go up a level but even as he was last year, he'd immediately be the best fullback in our team. Player swap for a year, see how he performs in our colours.
He's apparently on the outer so it's definitely a possibility.
I think if we let Macca go it’s more likely we get someone from the sharks, because McInnes would be going to the sharks. For no money, Moylan could be worth a shot.