Renegade
State of Origin Captain
Contributor
- Mar 14, 2008
- 9,222
- 11,857
I'll take one.I can make one for you too, if you like.
I'll take one.I can make one for you too, if you like.
Geez Wolfie, I never thought I'd here you demanding a young kid gets rushed into our side. You were always advocating for players to be properly developed in ISC. You can't have your cake and eat it mate (Even if it's a quarter of 1/5 of the 25 games remaining?1*?)If we are paying Piakura $400k a year i'd be expecting to see him playing NRL this year and soon. Thats a ridiculous amount of money to pay somebody who hasnt even proved he is a top player in ISC yet.
Tbf he isn't on $400k yet (if that is even correct) and 1910 mentioned he's struggling atm , no use throwing him in until he earns the right and is playing well. As I mentioned above he still has time to push for later in the season to get some games.
Geez Wolfie, I never thought I'd here you demanding a young kid gets rushed into our side. You were always advocating for players to be properly developed in ISC. You can't have your cake and eat it mate (Even if it's a quarter of 1/5 of the 25 games remaining?1*?)
Hard to say what the bigger picture is. Thought we were well stocked in the forwards, with lengthy contracts. If they didn't offer Walsh, which I agreed with, why this signing? I wanted to keep Walsh but wanted him to earn, and at a rookie rate. Did Kev get spooked after Walsh...If we are paying Piakura $400k a year i'd be expecting to see him playing NRL this year and soon. Thats a ridiculous amount of money to pay somebody who hasnt even proved he is a top player in ISC yet.
I think our balance is way out too. We need a settled experienced team where we can slowly introduce youngsters into and then slowly turn the roster over.Like i said before, i'm not actually really saying i think he should play as such. Probably badly worded on my part. I'm just over inflated contracts for unproven players. A player worth $300-400k a year should be ready to go. Maybe i'm a bit old fashioned with that, but its just my opinion.
I dont see how we can afford to keep paying these players so much money when proven, NRL ready players are more crucial to our rehabilitation as a club than promising kids. Lets face it, if we dont get our NRL side right, we arent going to have any good young players wanting to play here anyway, they wont want to join a bottom 4 football club . The balance is totally wrong right now imo and if we have to let some good young players walk at this moment in time then so be it.
Hard to say what the bigger picture is. Thought we were well stocked in the forwards, with lengthy contracts. If they didn't offer Walsh, which I agreed with, why this signing? I wanted to keep Walsh but wanted him to earn, and at a rookie rate. Did Kev get spooked after Walsh...
We've lost all bargaining power so we do need to pay overs , we just need to be smart who we pour the money into.Thats not what i'm saying. I wouldnt play him until he is ready either, and i dont think he is. I'd be fairly sure he is on a good contract. If he is even on $300k its still too much. He's proved nothing and as a club, we are learning nothing. We need to start letting these blokes walk if they arent willing to earn their contracts. You said in your post he shouldnt play until he earns the right, and thats correct. He also shouldnt get paid anywhere near first grade money until he earns that type on contract with his performances. Dont care who it is, or how much potential they have, we shouldn't reward a single player with a good contract until its been earned. We keep getting burned with these contracts.
If we get our culture spot on, show these young blokes they will be rewarded if they perform we will keep them over other clubs imo. We have to make sure we treat them properly and they will want to be in our system. At the moment, we dont seem to have that.
They haven’t overpaid by much of any... he has much more praise on him than Reece Walsh... and we got him for 400k for 3 years... in 3 years god knows how good he is... 400k for one of the best young players in the country is nothing these days and if he turns out shit and we don’t want his 400k we offer him up... plenty of clubs will pay a good chunk of that for a young second rower that they might get the best out ofI think they have overpaid because they lost Walsh.
Can he play NRL now cause he is on a professional contract? Or does he have to wait..?
It's a upgraded deal so more money this year and ends up being $1.2 over 4 years basically. Keep up dazzaGeez, thats almost what it would cost to get Capewell.
Well, Kurt would cost more obviously but, wouldnt it make sense to bring Capewell in and say to Piakura "listen mate, watch this NRL standard 2nd rower play - THIS is the standard needed for YOU to get $400k a year here..."
Look slike we may do it the other way around.
Oh well; im glad he has decided to stay, even if the contract is overs, doesnt really matter, cause we are literally swimming in money come the end of the season....
Can he play NRL now cause he is on a professional contract? Or does he have to wait..?
He could go that way. I see some promise but he is on way too much too earlyand Flegler, he feels all too much like a another Joe O to me.
Maybe we are getting Capewell as well. In isolation I don't hate the deal for Piakura it is more than is ideal but I think he is a very good prospect. The problem is when you put it alongside the other deals in the forward pack where we are paying big overs for TPK, Lodge and Flegler. Hopefully we are paying a lot of it from this years cap.Yep, it definitely looks like a panic move. Particularly given the reports that for an extra 50k a year you could get a consistent 2nd rower with origin experience.