- Aug 25, 2018
- 18,420
- 31,715
I'm more surprised that Payten didn't get the flick last season.Crazy what good coaching can do
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm more surprised that Payten didn't get the flick last season.Crazy what good coaching can do
Did he say this or we won't be going to the market next year? Because we should be going to the market this weekShame Ikin has stated we are happy with the guys we have
think it's easier with someone like Townsend next to him , but yes Thurston has done him the world of goodCrazy what good coaching can do
I would settle for someone who can come in, catch bombs, stands behind our forwards waiting for an offload, can tackle and doesn't defend in the line on the last tackle.Drinkwater isn't the answer to our fullback questions. You want to target a fullback, Reece Walsh is your man. Need to stop settling for stop gap solutions. You think Nui was bad yesterday in defence, Drinkwater is a walking turnstile and always has been. Its why he isn't in the NRL
Walters and Paix would share the minutes more than Turpin and Walters. Neither should be 70 minute hookers.I have learned quickly that a lot of people on here aren’t interested in what players are capable of in defense.
Just look at the Billy Walters to replace Turpin suggestions, Turpin makes 50 tackles a game in the middle of the field, how’s Billy Walters going to pull that off? They see him with some nice stepping and think he’s the answer, as if tackling doesn’t even matter.
Pretty sure he wants to play NRL moreHe is at 6, not so much at fullback. Like i said before, if he couldnt have defended and play the fullback role, Bellamy would never have put him in pole position to take over from Slater. The big problem with Drinky is he wants to play 6.
Pretty sure he wants to play NRL more
If Kevvie is unable to correctly interchange Turpin/Billy, what makes you think it will improve with Billy/Paix?Walters and Paix would share the minutes more than Turpin and Walters. Neither should be 70 minute hookers.
You'd think having Langer, Walters, Lockyer, Boyd and Prince on tap would add some value to our halves.think it's easier with someone like Townsend next to him , but yes Thurston has done him the world of good
Not having the preconceived notion that one of them can be a 70 minute tackle machine hooker, maybe?If Kevvie is unable to correctly interchange Turpin/Billy, what makes you think it will improve with Billy/Paix?
do you really think Niu defends in the line off his own back ?I would settle for someone who can come in, catch bombs, stands behind our forwards waiting for an offload, can tackle and doesn't defend in the line on the last tackle.
1 Drinkwater
6 Gamble
7 Reynolds
9 Walters
14 Paix
This group would do their jobs well enough each week.
didn't have a Townsend next to him and extra preseason, our was he supposed to be great right off the bat .You'd think having Langer, Walters, Lockyer, Boyd and Prince on tap would add some value to our halves.
I think he gets caught out position-wise and doesn’t have the speed to get to the ball in time. I’m sure the game plan isn’t to defend in the line and not move back until it’s way too latedo you really think Niu defends in the line off his own back ?
Niu is strong in support yeah he's had trouble in his defence and bomb defusal but Drinkwater was similar. he's a much better 6
So Kevvie isn't smart enough to realise Turpin shouldn't be playing 70? Either way, not good coaching.Not having the preconceived notion that one of them can be a 70 minute tackle machine hooker, maybe?
Or Carrigan shouldn’t play 68 minutes without a breakSo Kevvie isn't smart enough to realise Turpin shouldn't be playing 70? Either way, not good coaching.
one loss and your off .Or Carrigan shouldn’t play 68 minutes without a break
I just don’t rate it.one loss and your off .
what do you rate ? because it doesn't seem like muchI just don’t rate it.